From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Pau Monne Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 11/11] libxl: convert libxl_device_vfb_add to an async operation Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:10:25 +0100 Message-ID: <50115DE1.1070103@citrix.com> References: <1343314522-32298-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <1343314522-32298-12-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com> <1343315157.6812.42.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1343315157.6812.42.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Campbell wrote: > On Thu, 2012-07-26 at 15:55 +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >> Split libxl_device_vfb_add into libxl__device_vfb_add (to be used >> inside already running ao's), and make libxl_device_vfb_add a stub >> to call libxl__device_vfb_add. >> >> Changes since v11: >> >> * libxl__device_vfb_add is no longer an ao operation. > > Doesn't this change invalidate the changelog a bit? No, it's still true that we create libxl__device_vfb_add to be used inside an already running ao, because we can no longer use libxl_device_vfb_add because it will try to create a nested ao.