From: "zhenzhong.duan" <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Feng Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: kernel bootup slow issue on ovm3.1.1
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:23:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50223027.6080502@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120807162637.GB15053@phenom.dumpdata.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2612 bytes --]
? 2012-08-08 00:26, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk ??:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 03:22:50PM +0800, zhenzhong.duan wrote:
>> Hi maintainers,
>>
>> We meet a uek2 bootup slow issue on our ovm product(ovm3.0.3 and ovm3.1.1).
>>
>> The system env is an exalogic node with 24 cores + 100G mem (2 socket ,
>> 6 cores per socket, 2 HT threads per core).
>> After boot up this node with all cores enabled,
>> We boot a pvhvm with 12vpcus (or 24) + 90 GB + pci passthroughed device,
>> it takes 30+ mins to boot.
>> If we remove passthrough device from vm.cfg, bootup takes about 2 mins.
>> If we use a small mem(eg. 10G + 24 vcpus), bootup takes about 3 mins.
>> So a big mem + passthrough device made the worst case.
>>
>> If we boot this node with HT disabled from BIOS. Now only 12 cores are
>> available.
>> OVM on same node, same config with 12vpcus+90GB boots in 1.5 mins!
>>
>> After some debug, we found it's in kernel mtrr init that make this delay.
>>
>> mtrr_aps_init()
>> \-> set_mtrr()
>> \-> mtrr_work_handler()
>>
>> kernel spin in mtrr_work_handler.
>>
>> But we don't know the scene hide in the hypervisor. Why big mem +
>> passthrough made the worst case.
>> Is this already fixed in xen upstream?
>> Any comments are welcome, I'll upload all data depend on your need.
> What happens if you run with a upstream version of kernel? Say v3.4.7 ?
Hi konrad, Jan,
I tried 3.5.0-2.fc17.x86_64 and 3.6.0-rc1.
*
3.5.0-2.fc17.x86_64 took ~30 mins.*
Below is piece of fc17 dmesg:
#22[ 0.002999] installing Xen timer for CPU 22
#23[ 0.002999] installing Xen timer for CPU 23
[ 1.844896] Brought up 24 CPUs
[ 1.844898] Total of 24 processors activated (140449.34 BogoMIPS).
*block for 30 mins here.*
[ 1.899794] devtmpfs: initialized
[ 1.905956] atomic64 test passed for x86-64 platform with CX8 and
with SSE
*
3.6.0-rc1 took more than 2 hours.*
piece of dmesg:
cpu 22 spinlock event irq 218
[ 1.884775] #22[ 0.001999] installing Xen timer for CPU 22
cpu 23 spinlock event irq 225
[ 1.932764] #23[ 0.001999] installing Xen timer for CPU 23
[ 1.977734] Brought up 24 CPUs
[ 1.978706] smpboot: Total of 24 processors activated (140449.34
BogoMIPS)
*block for more than 2 hours here.*
[ 1.988859] devtmpfs: initialized
[ 2.021785] dummy:
[ 2.023706] NET: Registered protocol family 16
[ 2.026735] ACPI: bus type pci registered
[ 2.028002] PCI: Using configuration type 1 for base access
I also send a patch to lkml that can workaround this issue, but I don't
know the reason of block in xen side.
link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/7/50
regards
zduan
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3775 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-08 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 7:22 kernel bootup slow issue on ovm3.1.1 zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-07 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-08 9:48 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-08 14:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-08 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-09 9:42 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-09 10:35 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-10 4:40 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-10 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 7:58 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-13 9:29 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 11:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-29 5:19 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-29 18:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-29 5:36 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-30 9:03 ` Tim Deegan
2012-09-19 2:39 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-09-19 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-29 17:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-30 10:37 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-31 9:07 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 9:07 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-07 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-08 9:23 ` zhenzhong.duan [this message]
2012-08-08 14:43 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50223027.6080502@oracle.com \
--to=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).