From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] xen: improve changes to xen_add_to_physmap Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 15:20:37 +0100 Message-ID: <502275B5.9040500@cantab.net> References: <1344262325-26598-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> <501FFFB50200007800092FC7@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <502004BE0200007800093028@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <502131E202000078000933F9@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <50222DFB0200007800093746@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <1344411923.11783.1.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <5022445002000078000937B9@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jean Guyader Cc: "Tim Deegan (3P)" , Stefano Stabellini , "Jean Guyader (3P)" , xen-devel , Jan Beulich , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/08/2012 11:03, Jean Guyader wrote: > > I have introduced the size field for XENMAPSPACE_gmfn_range and that is used > by hvmload when we want to relocated the memory because the pci hole needs to be > bigger. Why do this so late? Rather than creating the domain with the correctly sized PCI hole? David