From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: (V2) tools/python: Clean python correctly Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:41:43 +0100 Message-ID: <502A8DD7.3080504@citrix.com> References: <502A5C58.5050001@citrix.com> <502A82DA.7000205@citrix.com> <20522.35865.492083.486374@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20522.35865.492083.486374@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Ian Campbell , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 14/08/12 18:34, Ian Jackson wrote: > Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] (V2) tools/python: Clean python correctly"): >> Attached version 2, because it seems that despite my testing, "python >> setup.py clean" still doesn't actually clean enough. >> >> On 14/08/12 15:10, Andrew Cooper wrote: >>> I discovered this with repeated calls to "make clean; make dist-tools" >>> >>> An alternative, if you wish to remove the use of $(PYTHON) from the >>> clean path is to just `rm -rf build`, but using setup.py seems neater. > Perhaps removing the build directory would be better and faster and > more reliable ? > > Ian. That would put the code in line with tools/pygrub. Sec while I make a v3 patch -- Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com