From: "zhenzhong.duan" <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Satish Kantheti <satish.kantheti@oracle.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Feng Jin <joe.jin@oracle.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: kernel bootup slow issue on ovm3.1.1
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 13:36:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <503DAA5F.5030306@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5028E53202000078000946B1@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
于 2012-08-13 17:29, Jan Beulich 写道:
>>>> On 13.08.12 at 09:58, "zhenzhong.duan"<zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> wrote:
>> 于 2012-08-10 22:22, Jan Beulich 写道:
>>> Going back to your original mail, I wonder however why this
>>> gets done at all. You said it got there via
>>>
>>> mtrr_aps_init()
>>> \-> set_mtrr()
>>> \-> mtrr_work_handler()
>>>
>>> yet this isn't done unconditionally - see the comment before
>>> checking mtrr_aps_delayed_init. Can you find out where the
>>> obviously necessary call(s) to set_mtrr_aps_delayed_init()
>>> come(s) from?
>> At bootup stage, set_mtrr_aps_delayed_init is called by
>> native_smp_prepare_cpus.
>> mtrr_aps_delayed_init is always set to ture for intel processor in upstream
>> code.
> Indeed, and that (in one form or another) has been done
> virtually forever in Linux. I wonder why the problem wasn't
> noticed (or looked into, if it was noticed) so far.
>
> As it's going to be rather difficult to convince the Linux folks
> to change their code (plus this wouldn't help with existing
> kernels anyway), we'll need to find a way to improve this in
> the hypervisor.
Hi Jan, Tim
Is this issue improvable from xen side?
thanks
zduan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-29 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-07 7:22 kernel bootup slow issue on ovm3.1.1 zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-07 8:37 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-08 9:48 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-08 14:47 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-08 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-09 9:42 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-09 10:35 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-10 4:40 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-10 14:22 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 7:58 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-13 9:29 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 11:08 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-29 5:19 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-29 18:28 ` Stefano Stabellini
2012-08-29 5:36 ` zhenzhong.duan [this message]
2012-08-30 9:03 ` Tim Deegan
2012-09-19 2:39 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-09-19 10:29 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-29 17:55 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-30 10:37 ` George Dunlap
2012-08-31 9:07 ` Jan Beulich
2012-08-13 9:07 ` Tim Deegan
2012-08-07 16:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-08-08 9:23 ` zhenzhong.duan
2012-08-08 14:43 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=503DAA5F.5030306@oracle.com \
--to=zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=joe.jin@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=satish.kantheti@oracle.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).