xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@gridcentric.ca>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/3] xen/privcmd: remove const modifier from declaration
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:43:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <504DC447.9010301@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <504DC8FE020000780009A190@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 10/09/12 10:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 08.09.12 at 11:58, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
>> When we use this pointer, we cast away the const modifier and modify the
>> data.  I think it was an accident to declare it as const.
> 
> NAK - the const is very valid here, as the v2 interface (as opposed
> to the v1 one) does _not_ modify this array (or if it does, it's a
> bug). This is a guarantee made to user mode, so it should also be
> expressed that way in the interface.
> 
> But of course the cast used before this patch isn't right either, as
> it indeed inappropriately discards the qualifier. Afaiu this was done
> to simplify the internal workings of the code, but I don't think it's
> desirable to sacrifice type safety for implementation simplicity.

m.arr here isn't const as m is really the V1 structure where m.arr is
non-const.

David

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-10 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-08  9:58 [patch 3/3] xen/privcmd: remove const modifier from declaration Dan Carpenter
2012-09-09 19:50 ` Andres Lagar-Cavilla
2012-09-10  9:03 ` Jan Beulich
2012-09-10 10:21   ` [patch 3/3 v2] xen/privcmd: add a __user annotation to a cast Dan Carpenter
2012-09-10 10:43   ` David Vrabel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=504DC447.9010301@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=andreslc@gridcentric.ca \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).