From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] Synchronize privcmd header constants Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:49:57 +0200 Message-ID: <508176A5.10401@citrix.com> References: <5171750d133ef2c27ac8.1350055853@xdev.gridcentric.ca> <1350547689.28188.31.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <50811145.3030705@citrix.com> <94CA9621-D7BF-45CB-A6A2-7F68E14D3C23@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <94CA9621-D7BF-45CB-A6A2-7F68E14D3C23@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andres Lagar-Cavilla Cc: Christoph Egger , Ian Campbell , Andres Lagar-Cavilla , Ian Jackson , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Andres Lagar-Cavilla , Attilio Rao List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 19/10/12 17:46, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote: > = > On Oct 19, 2012, at 4:37 AM, Roger Pau Monn=E9 wro= te: > = >> On 19/10/12 04:20, Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote: >>> I've had a look. The xen.org tree knows about three other OSes: minios,= solaris and netbsd. None knows about paged out frames. None uses the XEN_D= OMCTL_PFINFO_PAGEDTAB constant in domctl.h >>> >>> 1. The domctl.h constant can still go away without hurting other OSes. >> >> I've checked and NetBSD doesn't use XEN_DOMCTL_PFINFO_PAGEDTAB, so as >> Andres says I guess it's safe to remove it. >> >>> 2. It is trivial to add the PRIVCMD_MMAPBATCH_* constants to the privcm= d.h of other OSes. It can't hurt. I can do it here. Each OS Xen maintainer = would have to take care of syncing that up in the respective upstream. Howe= ver ... >>> 3. Not that trivial to teach all these OSes about paged out frames. Doe= s anyone care? >> >> Well, I'm sure the NetBSD community would be interested in this, but >> finding someone to actually work on it is a whole different story=85 > = > Thanks Roger. Ian should I expect a response from Solaris? Solaris (Illumos) is currently pretty broken, and has gone the KVM side as far as I know, so I wouldn't expect any response.