xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@xen.org>
Cc: xci-devel@lists.xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: XCI Archivation Review (VOTE)
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 11:28:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <508A65BF.5040807@xen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <508A652A.7050002@xen.org>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1906 bytes --]

And I just realized that I sent the wrong voting link: it should be
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dG9pRTkxbTJkTC1weExuWmVTS0tHdHc6MA#gid=0

Sorry

Lars

On 26/10/2012 11:25, Lars Kurth wrote:
> If you do not want to use Google Docs, please reply privately
> +1 (for Archivation)
> 0 (Abstain)
> -1 (against archivation)
>
> Lars
>
> On 26/10/2012 10:28, Lars Kurth wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> it's been on my list of things to do for a while, to formally close 
>> and archive the XCI project. The reason for archiving the project is:
>>
>>   * There is no Project Lead
>>   * The last try to revive the project in April/May did not lead anywhere
>>   * No activity in any of the repos for a year
>>   * No activity on XCI related wiki pages for a year
>>   * No activity on the mailing list for a year
>>
>> What happens after the review?
>>
>>   * The mailing list is archived (i.e. it is moved to the archived
>>     section) and closed for new posts
>>   * The wiki pages are archived
>>   * The web pages are moved into the xen.org <http://xen.org> archive
>>   * We will archive the repos
>>
>> What needs to happen formally vote on an archivation review?
>>
>> *Reviews:* These are off-line reviews which are open to all community 
>> members by which a proposal is published for review
>> [This is this e-mail, done]
>>
>> *Voting:* The community manager arranges a timed private vote as 
>> outlined above (voting should be open for a minimum of a week). Any 
>> maintainer of a mature project and the Xen.org community manager is 
>> allowed to vote. Voting follows the conventions as laid out in 
>> "Principle: Consensus Decision Making".
>>
>> The link to vote privately is here: 
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ao04FrB3gtj2dG9pRTkxbTJkTC1weExuWmVTS0tHdHc#gid=0
>> The vote will be open for two weeks until Nov 9th 2012.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Lars
>


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3368 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2012-10-26 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-26  9:28 XCI Archivation Review (VOTE) Lars Kurth
2012-10-26 10:25 ` Lars Kurth
2012-10-26 10:28   ` Lars Kurth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=508A65BF.5040807@xen.org \
    --to=lars.kurth@xen.org \
    --cc=xci-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).