From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 05 of 16 RFC] blktap3: Don't check if blktap is available Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:07:04 +0100 Message-ID: <508F98B8.1030209@citrix.com> References: <57896068356d4870c74a.1351098144@makatos-desktop> <1351250625.15162.42.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <4B45B535F7F6BE4CB1C044ED5115CDDE012D54AB8C61@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <1351582903.16868.9.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1351582903.16868.9.camel@hastur.hellion.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Thanos Makatos , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 30/10/12 08:41, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> >>> Perhaps even on Linux we would want a sanity check that the drivers are >>> present and loaded etc? >> >> We could ensure that the tapdisk binaries are present, apart from that >> I don't see anything else we could check. > > Could we check for /dev/xen/{evtchn,gntdev,...} or whatever else it > needs? We could also check with xc_gnttab_open, which will return an error on NetBSD.