From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Razvan Cojocaru Subject: Re: Hypervisor to dom0 communication Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:24:07 +0200 Message-ID: <50A22DD7.7020901@gmail.com> References: <50A16639.2090209@gmail.com> <1352800791.7491.21.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <50A22044.6060608@gmail.com> <1352802973.7491.40.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <50A225CA.2080705@gmail.com> <1352805173.7491.57.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1352805173.7491.57.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Perhaps it would be useful to build on the vmitools (previously > xenaccess)? http://code.google.com/p/vmitools/ Indeed, but LibVMI does not offer event-based access, and polling is not really a solution. > In general we prefer not to put stuff in the hypervisor unless > absolutely required. Me too :) Thanks, Razvan