xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhigang Wang <zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: VM memory allocation speed with cs 26056
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:42:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A68921.4010202@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A26B50.5090109@oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1880 bytes --]

On 11/13/2012 10:46 AM, Zhigang Wang wrote:
> On 11/12/2012 01:25 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> On 12/11/2012 15:01, "Zhigang Wang" <zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Keir/Jan,
>>>
>>> Recently I got a chance to access a big machine (2T mem/160 cpus) and I tested
>>> your patch: http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/rev/177fdda0be56
>>>
>>> Attached is the result.
>> The PVM result is weird, there is a small-ish slowdown for small domains,
>> becoming a very large %age slowdown as domain memory increases, and then
>> turning into a *speedup* as the memory size gets very large indeed.
>>
>> What are the error bars like on these measurements I wonder? One thing we
>> could do to allow PV guests doing 4k-at-a-time allocations through
>> alloc_heap_pages() to benefit from the TLB-flush improvements, is pull the
>> filtering-and-flush out into populate_physmap() and increase_reservation().
>> This is listed as a todo in the original patch (26056).
>>
>> To be honest I don't know why the original patch would make PV domain
>> creation slower, and certainly not by a varying %age depending on domain
>> memory size!
>>
>>  -- Keir
> I did it second time. It seems the result (attached) is promising.
>
> I think the strange result is due to the order of testing:
> start_physical_machine -> test_hvm -> test_pvm.
>
> This time, I did: start_physical_machine -> test_pvm -> test_hvm.
>
> You can see the pvm memory allocation speed is not affected by your patch this time.
>
> So I believe this patch is excellent now.

I get another chance to run the test without (old) and with (new) cs 25056 with
order:

start_physical_machine -> test_hvm -> test_pvm

It seems PV guest memory allocation is not affected by this patch, although it
makes a big difference if testing with order:

start_physical_machine -> test_pvm -> test_hvm

Thanks for the patch.

Zhigang


[-- Attachment #2: result.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 15769 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

      parent reply	other threads:[~2012-11-16 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-12 15:01 VM memory allocation speed with cs 26056 Zhigang Wang
2012-11-12 15:17 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-12 15:57   ` Zhigang Wang
2012-11-12 16:25   ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-12 18:25 ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-13 15:46   ` Zhigang Wang
2012-11-13 16:13     ` Dan Magenheimer
2012-11-13 17:17       ` Keir Fraser
2012-11-16 18:42     ` Zhigang Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A68921.4010202@oracle.com \
    --to=zhigang.x.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).