From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:16:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AE41DD.2030703@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AE4F8402000078000AAA02@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 22/11/12 15:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.11.12 at 16:00, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> The self_nmi() code cause's an NMI to be triggered by sending an APIC
>> message to the local processor. However, NMIs are blocked by the
>> VMEXIT, until the next iret or VMENTER.
>>
>> Volume 3 Chapter 27 Section 1 of the Intel SDM states:
>>
>> An NMI causes subsequent NMIs to be blocked, but only after the VM exit
>> completes.
>>
>> As a result, as soon as the VMENTER happens, an immediate VMEXIT
>> happens as a result of the queued NMI. We have seen hundreds of
>> iterations of this VMEXIT/VMENTER loop before the HVM guest resumes
>> normal operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>
>> --
>> Changes since v2
>> * Switch from 'int $2' to do_nmi()
>> * Reworked commit message to more clearly explain the problem
>>
>> diff -r 2489c2926698 -r d7ea938044ac xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -2269,6 +2269,14 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_
>> vector = intr_info & INTR_INFO_VECTOR_MASK;
>> if ( vector == TRAP_machine_check )
>> do_machine_check(regs);
>> + else if ( vector == TRAP_nmi &&
>> + ( (intr_info & INTR_INFO_INTR_TYPE_MASK) ==
>> + (X86_EVENTTYPE_NMI << 8) ) )
>> + /* Must be called before interrupts are enabled to ensure
>> + * the NMI handler code is run before the first IRET. The
>> + * IRET unblocks subsequent NMI's (Intel SDM Vol 3, 6.7.1)
>> + */
>> + do_nmi();
> But that's only half of it, at least as far as I recall the outcome of
> the discussion: You want an IRET (or VMRESUME) before possibly
> going into the scheduler (and hence not back to the current VM).
> And the same also on the PV exit path from an NMI.
>
> Jan
When I read this codepath, there seemed to be no consideration for
re-scheduling. I will double check, but I think the VMRESUME is
unconditional if the VMEXIT reason was a real NMI.
~Andrew
>
>> break;
>> case EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY:
>> do_machine_check(regs);
>> @@ -2442,7 +2450,6 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_
>> (X86_EVENTTYPE_NMI << 8) )
>> goto exit_and_crash;
>> HVMTRACE_0D(NMI);
>> - self_nmi(); /* Real NMI, vector 2: normal processing. */
>> break;
>> case TRAP_machine_check:
>> HVMTRACE_0D(MCE);
>
>
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-22 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-22 15:00 [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:16 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-11-22 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:55 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 16:12 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:31 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 9:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 12:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:00 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 13:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:25 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 14:49 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 15:55 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 16:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 16:01 ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 16:17 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 19:02 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 11:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 11:53 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:56 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 16:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 16:08 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: don't rely on __softirq_pending to be the first field in irq_cpustat_t Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 13:42 ` [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:04 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-11-22 15:22 ` Mats Petersson
2012-11-22 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 17:34 ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-26 11:50 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AE41DD.2030703@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).