xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>,
	"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:16:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AE41DD.2030703@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AE4F8402000078000AAA02@nat28.tlf.novell.com>


On 22/11/12 15:15, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.11.12 at 16:00, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> The self_nmi() code cause's an NMI to be triggered by sending an APIC
>> message to the local processor.  However, NMIs are blocked by the
>> VMEXIT, until the next iret or VMENTER.
>>
>> Volume 3 Chapter 27 Section 1 of the Intel SDM states:
>>
>> An NMI causes subsequent NMIs to be blocked, but only after the VM exit
>> completes.
>>
>> As a result, as soon as the VMENTER happens, an immediate VMEXIT
>> happens as a result of the queued NMI.  We have seen hundreds of
>> iterations of this VMEXIT/VMENTER loop before the HVM guest resumes
>> normal operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>>
>> --
>> Changes since v2
>>  * Switch from 'int $2' to do_nmi()
>>  * Reworked commit message to more clearly explain the problem
>>
>> diff -r 2489c2926698 -r d7ea938044ac xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -2269,6 +2269,14 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_
>>          vector = intr_info & INTR_INFO_VECTOR_MASK;
>>          if ( vector == TRAP_machine_check )
>>              do_machine_check(regs);
>> +        else if ( vector == TRAP_nmi &&
>> +                ( (intr_info & INTR_INFO_INTR_TYPE_MASK) ==
>> +                  (X86_EVENTTYPE_NMI << 8) ) )
>> +            /* Must be called before interrupts are enabled to ensure
>> +             * the NMI handler code is run before the first IRET. The
>> +             * IRET unblocks subsequent NMI's (Intel SDM Vol 3, 6.7.1)
>> +             */
>> +            do_nmi();
> But that's only half of it, at least as far as I recall the outcome of
> the discussion: You want an IRET (or VMRESUME) before possibly
> going into the scheduler (and hence not back to the current VM).
> And the same also on the PV exit path from an NMI.
>
> Jan

When I read this codepath, there seemed to be no consideration for
re-scheduling.  I will double check, but I think the VMRESUME is
unconditional if the VMEXIT reason was a real NMI.

~Andrew

>
>>          break;
>>      case EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY:
>>          do_machine_check(regs);
>> @@ -2442,7 +2450,6 @@ void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_
>>                   (X86_EVENTTYPE_NMI << 8) )
>>                  goto exit_and_crash;
>>              HVMTRACE_0D(NMI);
>> -            self_nmi(); /* Real NMI, vector 2: normal processing. */
>>              break;
>>          case TRAP_machine_check:
>>              HVMTRACE_0D(MCE);
>
>

-- 
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-22 15:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-22 15:00 [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:16   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2012-11-22 15:21     ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:37       ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:55         ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:05           ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 16:12             ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:31               ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28  9:58             ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 12:32               ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:00               ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 13:12                 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:39                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:25                   ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:42                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:45                       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 14:49                       ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 15:01                         ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:41                       ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:52                         ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 15:55                         ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 16:12                           ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 16:01                         ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 16:17                           ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 19:02                             ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 10:49                               ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:56                                 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 11:37                                   ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 11:53                                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:56                                       ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 16:01                                         ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 16:08                                           ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:57                                 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: don't rely on __softirq_pending to be the first field in irq_cpustat_t Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:55                                 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 13:42                 ` [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:04                   ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:51                 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-11-22 15:22     ` Mats Petersson
2012-11-22 16:00       ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 17:34 ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-26 11:50   ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50AE41DD.2030703@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).