From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@citrix.com>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 16:31:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50AE5348.502@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50AE5D1102000078000AAA69@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 22/11/12 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 22.11.12 at 17:05, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 22/11/12 15:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 22.11.12 at 16:37, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> A quick solution would be to execute a noop function with
>>>> run_in_exception_handler(). Alternatively, I can code enable_nmi() or
>>>> so which does an inline iret to itself. Which of these would you prefer?
>>> I would actually consider avoiding to run softirqs altogether in that
>>> case, just like native Linux doesn't do any event or scheduler
>>> processing in that case.
>> That would probably be the easiest solution.
>>
>> I was already going to do the same for the rentrant NMI and MCE handling
>> case (and also the process pending upcalls checking), due to the
>> complexities of fixing the race condition at the end of the handler.
>>
>> Unfortunately, I don't think I have time to look at this issue
>> immediately, but if it is ok to wait till the beginning of next week, I
> That's fine of course.
>
>> can roll it into the main dev work for the other NMI/MCE work.
> Hmm, that would mean it's going to be more difficult to backport.
> I'd prefer having this in as simple a fashion as possible in the
> patch here, and then have your other patch(es) build on top of
> that.
>
> Jan
>
I will ensure that the fix for this is suitably separate in the patch
series, and in the easiest backportable form.
--
Andrew Cooper - Dom0 Kernel Engineer, Citrix XenServer
T: +44 (0)1223 225 900, http://www.citrix.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-22 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-22 15:00 [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:15 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:16 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:21 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 15:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 15:55 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-11-22 16:12 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 16:31 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-02-28 9:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 12:32 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:00 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 13:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 13:39 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:25 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:42 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:45 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 14:49 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:41 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 15:52 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-28 15:55 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 16:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 16:01 ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 16:17 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 19:02 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 10:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 11:37 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 11:53 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:56 ` Keir Fraser
2013-03-01 16:01 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-01 16:08 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 10:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: don't rely on __softirq_pending to be the first field in irq_cpustat_t Jan Beulich
2013-03-01 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] x86: defer processing events on the NMI exit path Keir Fraser
2013-02-28 13:42 ` [PATCH V3] vmx/nmi: Do not use self_nmi() in VMEXIT handler Jan Beulich
2013-02-28 14:04 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-28 14:51 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-11-22 15:22 ` Mats Petersson
2012-11-22 16:00 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-22 17:34 ` Tim Deegan
2012-11-26 11:50 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50AE5348.502@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=malcolm.crossley@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).