From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 of 3] xen: sched_credit: add some tracing
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 11:51:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50BF3530.8080603@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1354708472.21632.21.camel@Abyss>
On 05/12/12 11:54, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-12-04 at 19:10 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On 03/12/12 16:35, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>>> + /* Avoid TRACE_* to avoid a lot of useless !tb_init_done checks */
>>> + for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask)
>>> + {
>>> + struct {
>>> + unsigned cpu:8;
>>> + } d;
>>> + d.cpu = cpu;
>>> + trace_var(TRC_CSCHED_TICKLE, 0,
>>> + sizeof(d),
>>> + (unsigned char*)&d);
>> Why not just TRC_1D()?
>>
> As I tried to explain in the comment, I just wanted to avoid checking
> for !tb_init_done more than once, as this happens within a loop and, at
> least potentially, there may be more CPUs to tickle (and thus more calls
> to TRACE_1D). I take this comment of yours as you not thinking that is
> something worthwhile, right? If so, I can definitely turn this into a
> "standard" TRACE_1D() call.
Oh right -- yeah, no sense in having a duplicate check on tb_init_done;
but the struct is still pointless; just passing sizeof(cpu) and &cpu
should be prettier (even if the complier will probably optimize it to
the same thing).
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-05 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-03 16:34 [PATCH 0 of 3] xen: sched_credit: fix tickling and add some tracing Dario Faggioli
2012-12-03 16:34 ` [PATCH 1 of 3] xen: sched_credit, improve tickling of idle CPUs Dario Faggioli
2012-12-03 17:12 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-03 18:26 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-05 12:16 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-03 16:34 ` [PATCH 2 of 3] xen: tracing: introduce per-scheduler trace event IDs Dario Faggioli
2012-12-04 18:53 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-04 18:55 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-05 11:57 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-03 16:35 ` [PATCH 3 of 3] xen: sched_credit: add some tracing Dario Faggioli
2012-12-04 19:10 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-05 11:54 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-05 11:51 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2012-12-05 12:01 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-05 12:15 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-05 12:20 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-05 12:25 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-05 12:38 ` Mats Petersson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50BF3530.8080603@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=raistlin@linux.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).