From: Razvan Cojocaru <rzvncj@gmail.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: "Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libxc: Add xc_domain_hvm_get_mtrr_type() call
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:10:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D1D8D4.8030300@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355929247.14620.436.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
>> I did manage to take 'enabled' into account with what appears to be
>> success, but if I've read the situation correctly, there's not much to
>> do about 'overlap', unless we save it in hvm_save_mtrr_msr() like it's
>> done with 'enabled'. What do you think?
>
> It's not an architectural thing so I don't think it belongs in there.
>
> TBH until someone figures out or explains what overlap actually is I
> don't know if it even needs exporting or taking into account in
> userspace.
Well, get_mtrr_range() is being called by is_var_mtrr_overlapped(),
which is the function that sets m->overlapped, which is then used quite
a lot in the logic of the get_mtrr_type(), which this patch attempts to
bring into userspace via libxc.
I would quite happily discount all checks against the overlap boolean
argument (and my code seems to work like that), but I suspect whoever
wrote get_mtrr_type() had good reason to check for that.
Thanks,
Razvan Cojocaru
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-19 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-17 11:38 [PATCH] libxc: Add xc_domain_hvm_get_mtrr_type() call Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-18 17:04 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-18 17:24 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-19 10:14 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-19 10:42 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-19 11:28 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-19 11:49 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-19 12:00 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-19 14:57 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-19 15:00 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-19 15:10 ` Razvan Cojocaru [this message]
2012-12-19 15:27 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-12-19 15:54 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-19 16:11 ` Andrew Cooper
2012-12-19 16:15 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-19 16:29 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-19 17:46 ` Tim Deegan
2012-12-19 19:35 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-20 11:57 ` Tim Deegan
2012-12-20 13:40 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-19 15:43 ` Razvan Cojocaru
2012-12-20 11:54 ` Tim Deegan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D1D8D4.8030300@gmail.com \
--to=rzvncj@gmail.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).