From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Cc: Marcus Granado <Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@oracle.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@recoil.org>,
Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com>,
Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>,
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>,
Matt Wilson <msw@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08 of 10 v2] libxl: automatic placement deals with node-affinity
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 16:22:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D48CC8.6080801@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff98e6bcc0dd18f6b97a.1355944044@Solace>
On 19/12/12 19:07, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Which basically means the following two things:
> 1) during domain creation, it is the node-affinity of
> the domain --rather than the vcpu-affinities of its
> VCPUs-- that is affected by automatic placement;
> 2) during automatic placement, when counting how many
> VCPUs are already "bound" to a placement candidate
> (as part of the process of choosing the best
> candidate), both vcpu-affinity and node-affinity
> are considered.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
> Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> Acked-by: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com>
Re-confirming Ack.
-George
>
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_dom.c
> @@ -133,13 +133,13 @@ static int numa_place_domain(libxl__gc *
> {
> int found;
> libxl__numa_candidate candidate;
> - libxl_bitmap candidate_nodemap;
> + libxl_bitmap cpupool_nodemap;
> libxl_cpupoolinfo cpupool_info;
> int i, cpupool, rc = 0;
> uint32_t memkb;
>
> libxl__numa_candidate_init(&candidate);
> - libxl_bitmap_init(&candidate_nodemap);
> + libxl_bitmap_init(&cpupool_nodemap);
>
> /*
> * Extract the cpumap from the cpupool the domain belong to. In fact,
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int numa_place_domain(libxl__gc *
> rc = libxl_domain_need_memory(CTX, info, &memkb);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
> - if (libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &candidate_nodemap, 0)) {
> + if (libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &cpupool_nodemap, 0)) {
> rc = ERROR_FAIL;
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -174,17 +174,19 @@ static int numa_place_domain(libxl__gc *
> if (found == 0)
> goto out;
>
> - /* Map the candidate's node map to the domain's info->cpumap */
> - libxl__numa_candidate_get_nodemap(gc, &candidate, &candidate_nodemap);
> - rc = libxl_nodemap_to_cpumap(CTX, &candidate_nodemap, &info->cpumap);
> + /* Map the candidate's node map to the domain's info->nodemap */
> + libxl__numa_candidate_get_nodemap(gc, &candidate, &info->nodemap);
> +
> + /* Avoid trying to set the affinity to nodes that might be in the
> + * candidate's nodemap but out of our cpupool. */
> + rc = libxl_cpumap_to_nodemap(CTX, &cpupool_info.cpumap,
> + &cpupool_nodemap);
> if (rc)
> goto out;
>
> - /* Avoid trying to set the affinity to cpus that might be in the
> - * nodemap but not in our cpupool. */
> - libxl_for_each_set_bit(i, info->cpumap) {
> - if (!libxl_bitmap_test(&cpupool_info.cpumap, i))
> - libxl_bitmap_reset(&info->cpumap, i);
> + libxl_for_each_set_bit(i, info->nodemap) {
> + if (!libxl_bitmap_test(&cpupool_nodemap, i))
> + libxl_bitmap_reset(&info->nodemap, i);
> }
>
> LOG(DETAIL, "NUMA placement candidate with %d nodes, %d cpus and "
> @@ -193,7 +195,7 @@ static int numa_place_domain(libxl__gc *
>
> out:
> libxl__numa_candidate_dispose(&candidate);
> - libxl_bitmap_dispose(&candidate_nodemap);
> + libxl_bitmap_dispose(&cpupool_nodemap);
> libxl_cpupoolinfo_dispose(&cpupool_info);
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -211,10 +213,10 @@ int libxl__build_pre(libxl__gc *gc, uint
> /*
> * Check if the domain has any CPU affinity. If not, try to build
> * up one. In case numa_place_domain() find at least a suitable
> - * candidate, it will affect info->cpumap accordingly; if it
> + * candidate, it will affect info->nodemap accordingly; if it
> * does not, it just leaves it as it is. This means (unless
> * some weird error manifests) the subsequent call to
> - * libxl_set_vcpuaffinity_all() will do the actual placement,
> + * libxl_domain_set_nodeaffinity() will do the actual placement,
> * whatever that turns out to be.
> */
> if (libxl_defbool_val(info->numa_placement)) {
> diff --git a/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c b/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_numa.c
> @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *
> int vcpus_on_node[])
> {
> libxl_dominfo *dinfo = NULL;
> - libxl_bitmap vcpu_nodemap;
> + libxl_bitmap dom_nodemap, vcpu_nodemap;
> int nr_doms, nr_cpus;
> int i, j, k;
>
> @@ -197,6 +197,12 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *
> return ERROR_FAIL;
> }
>
> + if (libxl_node_bitmap_alloc(CTX, &dom_nodemap, 0) < 0) {
> + libxl_bitmap_dispose(&vcpu_nodemap);
> + libxl_dominfo_list_free(dinfo, nr_doms);
> + return ERROR_FAIL;
> + }
> +
> for (i = 0; i < nr_doms; i++) {
> libxl_vcpuinfo *vinfo;
> int nr_dom_vcpus;
> @@ -205,14 +211,21 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *
> if (vinfo == NULL)
> continue;
>
> + /* Retrieve the domain's node-affinity map */
> + libxl_domain_get_nodeaffinity(CTX, dinfo[i].domid, &dom_nodemap);
> +
> for (j = 0; j < nr_dom_vcpus; j++) {
> - /* For each vcpu of each domain, increment the elements of
> - * the array corresponding to the nodes where the vcpu runs */
> + /*
> + * For each vcpu of each domain, it must have both vcpu-affinity
> + * and node-affinity to (a pcpu belonging to) a certain node to
> + * cause an increment in the corresponding element of the array.
> + */
> libxl_bitmap_set_none(&vcpu_nodemap);
> libxl_for_each_set_bit(k, vinfo[j].cpumap) {
> int node = tinfo[k].node;
>
> if (libxl_bitmap_test(suitable_cpumap, k) &&
> + libxl_bitmap_test(&dom_nodemap, node) &&
> !libxl_bitmap_test(&vcpu_nodemap, node)) {
> libxl_bitmap_set(&vcpu_nodemap, node);
> vcpus_on_node[node]++;
> @@ -223,6 +236,7 @@ static int nr_vcpus_on_nodes(libxl__gc *
> libxl_vcpuinfo_list_free(vinfo, nr_dom_vcpus);
> }
>
> + libxl_bitmap_dispose(&dom_nodemap);
> libxl_bitmap_dispose(&vcpu_nodemap);
> libxl_dominfo_list_free(dinfo, nr_doms);
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-19 19:07 [PATCH 00 of 10 v2] NUMA aware credit scheduling Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 01 of 10 v2] xen, libxc: rename xenctl_cpumap to xenctl_bitmap Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 9:17 ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20 9:35 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 02 of 10 v2] xen, libxc: introduce node maps and masks Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 9:18 ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20 9:55 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 14:33 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-20 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20 15:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 03 of 10 v2] xen: sched_credit: let the scheduler know about node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 6:44 ` Juergen Gross
2012-12-20 8:16 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 8:25 ` Juergen Gross
2012-12-20 8:33 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 8:39 ` Juergen Gross
2012-12-20 8:58 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 15:28 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-20 16:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 9:22 ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20 15:56 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-20 17:12 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 16:48 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-20 18:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 14:29 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:07 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 20:21 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 0:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 14:56 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:13 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 04 of 10 v2] xen: allow for explicitly specifying node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 15:17 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:17 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-01-03 16:05 ` Daniel De Graaf
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 05 of 10 v2] libxc: " Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 15:19 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:27 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 06 of 10 v2] libxl: " Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 15:30 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:18 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 17:02 ` Ian Jackson
2012-12-21 17:09 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 07 of 10 v2] libxl: optimize the calculation of how many VCPUs can run on a candidate Dario Faggioli
2012-12-20 8:41 ` Ian Campbell
2012-12-20 9:24 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 16:00 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:23 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 08 of 10 v2] libxl: automatic placement deals with node-affinity Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 16:22 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 09 of 10 v2] xl: add node-affinity to the output of `xl list` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-21 16:34 ` George Dunlap
2012-12-21 16:54 ` Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 19:07 ` [PATCH 10 of 10 v2] docs: rearrange and update NUMA placement documentation Dario Faggioli
2012-12-19 23:16 ` [PATCH 00 of 10 v2] NUMA aware credit scheduling Dario Faggioli
2013-01-11 12:19 ` Ian Campbell
2013-01-11 13:57 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-01-11 14:09 ` Ian Campbell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D48CC8.6080801@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Andrew.Cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=Marcus.Granado@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=anil@recoil.org \
--cc=dan.magenheimer@oracle.com \
--cc=dario.faggioli@citrix.com \
--cc=dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=juergen.gross@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=msw@amazon.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).