xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Ben Guthro <ben.guthro@gmail.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ben Guthro <ben@guthro.net>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: Only CPU0 active after ACPI S3, xen 4.1.3
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2012 03:49:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D6713C.2000202@invisiblethingslab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3368417890369848263@unknownmsgid>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 787 bytes --]

On 21.12.2012 17:18, Ben Guthro wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>> On 21.12.12 at 16:30, Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com> wrote:
>>> Next bisection (this time with sched_ratelimit_us=0) gives this commit:
>>> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-4.1-testing.hg/rev/d67e4d12723f
>>
>> Ben, wasn't this where your bisection ended up too?
> 
> Yes, for the dom0_pin_vcpus issue.

Ok, I can confirm that on xen-4.1-testing tip with above commit reverted
completely problem has gone away, even without sched_ratelimit_us=0. With
Ben's patch (partially revert) no reboot observed, but still sometimes only
pCPU0 is used after resume.

-- 
Best Regards / Pozdrawiam,
Marek Marczykowski
Invisible Things Lab


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 553 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-23  2:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-29 18:55 Only CPU0 active after ACPI S3, xen 4.1.3 Marek Marczykowski
2012-11-30  9:33 ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-30 16:07   ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-11-30 16:12     ` Jan Beulich
2012-11-30 16:18       ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-03  7:39         ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-04 13:27           ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-20 15:59             ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-20 16:37               ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-20 19:41               ` Ben Guthro
2012-12-20 23:17                 ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-21  4:52                   ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-21  8:55                     ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-21 13:33                       ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-21 13:34                         ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-21 13:42                         ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-21 13:59                           ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-21 14:03                             ` Ben Guthro
2012-12-21 14:05                             ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-21 15:30                             ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-12-21 15:54                               ` Ben Guthro
2012-12-21 16:03                               ` Jan Beulich
2012-12-21 16:18                                 ` Ben Guthro
2012-12-23  2:49                                   ` Marek Marczykowski [this message]
2012-12-23 13:45                                     ` Ben Guthro
2012-12-31 12:51                                       ` Ben Guthro
2013-01-03  8:52                                         ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-16 11:22                                           ` George Dunlap
2013-01-16 11:58                                             ` George Dunlap
2013-01-16 13:08                                               ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-16 13:58                                                 ` George Dunlap
2013-01-16 14:31                                                   ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-03  8:52                         ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-12  7:05                           ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-01-14  3:28                             ` Marek Marczykowski
2012-11-30 21:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2012-11-30 22:12   ` Ben Guthro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50D6713C.2000202@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --to=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=ben.guthro@gmail.com \
    --cc=ben@guthro.net \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).