From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Security disclosure process discussion update Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:41:54 +0000 Message-ID: <50F578C2.40609@eu.citrix.com> References: <20130107163701.GA6682@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1357577179.7989.133.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <20130107191220.GD8615@phenom.dumpdata.com> <1357635393.12649.88.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1357635393.12649.88.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-users@lists.xen.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 08/01/13 08:56, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 19:12 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:46:19PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> Dropping -announce. >>> >>> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 16:37 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> >>>> So if we use an mailing list internally.. >>>>> * Applicants and current members must submit a statement saying that they >>>>> have >>>>> read, understand, and will abide by this process document. >>>> Are the folks on the internal mailing list bound by this as well? Meaning >>>> that if a new person would like to join the internal mailing list they >>>> need to have read, understood, etc the process document? >>> I understood this to mean that the Organisation was agreeing to abide by >>> it, which implies a duty to ensure that anyone with that organisation >>> who is exposed to confidential information keeps it confidential. One >>> obvious way to implement that would be the company to internally require >>> new people to read and agree to the process document, but Xen.org need >>> not be involved in that. >>> >>> It's not that dissimilar to how NDAs work in general I think. >> Except that you don't have to mail out the forms :-) > Perhaps the wording could be tweaked to make it clearer that the > *organisation* is agreeing to the policy and to taking on the > responsibility of ensuring that any members/employees of that > organisation who come into contact with confidential information will > abide by it too. I'll take a look at seeing if I can make the wording clearer regarding this. -George