From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: 4.3 Planning: Taking stock Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:06:24 +0000 Message-ID: <51001890.2020201@eu.citrix.com> References: <20130123170519.GA22719@phenom.dumpdata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20130123170519.GA22719@phenom.dumpdata.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Stefano Stabellini , Ian Campbell , Jan Beulich , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 23/01/13 17:05, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 04:32:05PM +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> We're 4 months into our estimated 9-months release schedule, and 2 months >> away from the scheduled feature freeze. It seems like a good time to take >> stock of where we are and make sure we're on track for the release. >> >> Below are the features on my list, sorted by how likely they are to be >> completed. Overall, the set of {completed, on-track} features looks pretty >> good. >> >> The first question to ask is this this: >> >> 1. Are there any features we absolutely need for 4.3 that are not on this >> list? > PVH .. at least the hypercall number/format needs to be set in stone. PVH is right at the top of the "features on track" section. :-) The purpose of this question is to ask everyone to think about anything *else* we we really need, so we don't end up with a 6-month feature freeze again. I think everyone agrees that PVH is a blocker. At the moment it doesn't look like it needs any intervention; there's no particular need to talk about interventions until something comes up. -George