* Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal
@ 2013-01-30 9:12 Stefan Bader
2013-01-30 11:18 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Bader @ 2013-01-30 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Keir Fraser
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 415 bytes --]
I could imagine that there will be other parties trying to compile Xen 4.2 on a
glibc >= 2.17 environment. So maybe this is worth being cherry-picked into the
stable-4.2 branch?
Cheers,
Stefan
From 5d98adc3e5e859ba23f62ca63450f6a60a9c5e2f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:50:48 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] tools/gdbsx: fix build failure with glibc-2.17
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 899 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal
2013-01-30 9:12 Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal Stefan Bader
@ 2013-01-30 11:18 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-30 11:27 ` Stefan Bader
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2013-01-30 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Bader; +Cc: Ian Jackson, xen-devel
>>> On 30.01.13 at 10:12, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com> wrote:
> I could imagine that there will be other parties trying to compile Xen 4.2 on
> a
> glibc >= 2.17 environment. So maybe this is worth being cherry-picked into the
> stable-4.2 branch?
Keir isn't looking after the stable trees anymore, I am now.
Tools backports however get usually done by Ian Jackson (Cc-ed),
so you should direct future similar requests to him or me.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal
2013-01-30 11:18 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2013-01-30 11:27 ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-30 15:17 ` Andrew Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Bader @ 2013-01-30 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Ian Jackson, xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 593 bytes --]
On 30.01.2013 12:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 30.01.13 at 10:12, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com> wrote:
>> I could imagine that there will be other parties trying to compile Xen 4.2 on
>> a
>> glibc >= 2.17 environment. So maybe this is worth being cherry-picked into the
>> stable-4.2 branch?
>
> Keir isn't looking after the stable trees anymore, I am now.
>
> Tools backports however get usually done by Ian Jackson (Cc-ed),
> so you should direct future similar requests to him or me.
>
> Jan
>
OK, will try to remember for the future.
Thanks,
Stefan
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 899 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal
2013-01-30 11:27 ` Stefan Bader
@ 2013-01-30 15:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-15 15:07 ` Ian Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cooper @ 2013-01-30 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Bader; +Cc: Ian Jackson, Jan Beulich, xen-devel
On the subject of backport requests,
Can I request the backport of rev 26373:56daf05bcf69 to xen-4.2, which
fixes SBDF encoding in the ocaml bindings.
Rev 26374 is also a possibility, but as it is not strictly a fix, it is
rather less important.
Thanks,
~Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal
2013-01-30 15:17 ` Andrew Cooper
@ 2013-02-15 15:07 ` Ian Jackson
2013-02-15 15:12 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ian Jackson @ 2013-02-15 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper; +Cc: Jan Beulich, Stefan Bader, xen-devel
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal"):
> On the subject of backport requests,
>
> Can I request the backport of rev 26373:56daf05bcf69 to xen-4.2, which
> fixes SBDF encoding in the ocaml bindings.
Done.
> Rev 26374 is also a possibility, but as it is not strictly a fix, it is
> rather less important.
I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to take this. Personally I
would be inclined to do so, because it will make any future patches
here easier if they don't divert, but I would like to ask the Jan's
opinion as the stable maintainer.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal
2013-02-15 15:07 ` Ian Jackson
@ 2013-02-15 15:12 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2013-02-15 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cooper, Ian Jackson; +Cc: Stefan Bader, xen-devel
>>> On 15.02.13 at 16:07, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal"):
>> Rev 26374 is also a possibility, but as it is not strictly a fix, it is
>> rather less important.
>
> I'm not sure whether it's a good idea to take this. Personally I
> would be inclined to do so, because it will make any future patches
> here easier if they don't divert, but I would like to ask the Jan's
> opinion as the stable maintainer.
If the "no functional change" is true (which it looks like it is), then
I don't mind this being put in if it helps going forward.
That said, the change looks questionable in one aspect: PCI
terminology uses "device" and "slot" interchangeably, and hence
it was pointless to do that part of the renaming.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-15 15:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-30 9:12 Xen 4.2 cherry-pick proposal Stefan Bader
2013-01-30 11:18 ` Jan Beulich
2013-01-30 11:27 ` Stefan Bader
2013-01-30 15:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-15 15:07 ` Ian Jackson
2013-02-15 15:12 ` Jan Beulich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).