From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Steven Haigh <netwiz@crc.id.au>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: 4.2.1: Poor write performance for DomU.
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:26:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <512488AC.1020702@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51243089.8020307@crc.id.au>
On 20/02/13 03:10, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Firstly, please CC me in to any replies as I'm not a subscriber these days.
>
> I've been trying to debug a problem with Xen 4.2.1 where I am unable to
> achieve more than ~50Mb/sec sustained sequential write to a disk. The
> DomU is configured as such:
Since you mention 4.2.1 explicitly, is this a performance regression
from previous versions? (4.2.0 or the 4.1 branch)
> name = "zeus.vm"
> memory = 1024
> vcpus = 2
> cpus = "1-3"
> disk = [ 'phy:/dev/RAID1/zeus.vm,xvda,w',
> 'phy:/dev/vg_raid6/fileshare,xvdb,w' ]
> vif = [ "mac=02:16:36:35:35:09, bridge=br203,
> vifname=vm.zeus.203", "mac=10:16:36:35:35:09, bridge=br10,
> vifname=vm.zeus.10" ]
> bootloader = "pygrub"
>
> on_poweroff = 'destroy'
> on_reboot = 'restart'
> on_crash = 'restart'
>
> I have tested the underlying LVM config by mounting
> /dev/vg_raid6/fileshare from within the Dom0 and running bonnie++ as a
> benchmark:
>
> Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
> --Random-
> Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
> --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
> /sec %CP
> xenhost.lan.crc. 2G 667 96 186976 21 80430 14 956 95 290591 26
> 373.7 8
> Latency 26416us 212ms 168ms 35494us 35989us 83759us
> Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
> Create--------
> xenhost.lan.crc.id. -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
> -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> /sec %CP
> 16 14901 32 +++++ +++ 19672 39 15307 34 +++++ +++
> 18158 37
> Latency 17838us 141us 298us 365us 133us 296us
>
> ~186Mb/sec write, ~290Mb/sec read. Awesome.
>
> I then started a single DomU which gets passed /dev/vg_raid6/fileshare
> through as xvdb. It is then mounted in /mnt/fileshare/. I then ran
> bonnie++ again in the DomU:
>
> Version 1.96 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input-
> --Random-
> Concurrency 1 -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block--
> --Seeks--
> Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP
> /sec %CP
> zeus.crc.id.au 2G 658 96 50618 8 42398 10 1138 99 267568 30
> 494.9 11
> Latency 22959us 226ms 311ms 14617us 41816us 72814us
> Version 1.96 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random
> Create--------
> zeus.crc.id.au -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read---
> -Delete--
> files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> /sec %CP
> 16 21749 59 +++++ +++ 31089 73 23283 64 +++++ +++
> 31114 75
> Latency 18989us 164us 928us 480us 26us 87us
>
> ~50Mb/sec write, ~267Mb/sec read. Not so awesome.
We are currently working on improving the speed of pv block drivers, I
will look into this difference between the read/write speed, but I would
guess this is due to the size of the request/ring.
>
> /dev/vg_raid6/fileshare exists as an LV on /dev/md2:
>
> # lvdisplay vg_raid6/fileshare
> --- Logical volume ---
> LV Path /dev/vg_raid6/fileshare
> LV Name fileshare
> VG Name vg_raid6
> LV UUID cwC0yK-Xr56-WB5v-10bw-3AZT-pYj0-piWett
> LV Write Access read/write
> LV Creation host, time xenhost.lan.crc.id.au, 2013-02-18 20:59:40 +1100
> LV Status available
> # open 1
> LV Size 2.50 TiB
> Current LE 655360
> Segments 1
> Allocation inherit
> Read ahead sectors auto
> - currently set to 1024
> Block device 253:5
>
>
> md2 : active raid6 sdd[4] sdc[0] sde[1] sdf[5]
> 3907026688 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 128k chunk, algorithm 2
> [4/4] [UUUU]
>
> Heres a quick output of 'xm info' - although its full VM load is running
> now:
> # xm info
> host : xenhost.lan.crc.id.au
> release : 3.7.9-1.el6xen.x86_64
> version : #1 SMP Mon Feb 18 14:46:35 EST 2013
> machine : x86_64
> nr_cpus : 4
> nr_nodes : 1
> cores_per_socket : 4
> threads_per_core : 1
> cpu_mhz : 3303
> hw_caps :
> bfebfbff:28100800:00000000:00003f40:179ae3bf:00000000:00000001:00000000
> virt_caps : hvm
> total_memory : 8116
> free_memory : 1346
> free_cpus : 0
> xen_major : 4
> xen_minor : 2
> xen_extra : .1
> xen_caps : xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_32
> hvm-3.0-x86_32p hvm-3.0-x86_64
> xen_scheduler : credit
> xen_pagesize : 4096
> platform_params : virt_start=0xffff800000000000
> xen_changeset : unavailable
> xen_commandline : dom0_mem=1024M cpufreq=xen dom0_max_vcpus=1
> dom0_vcpus_pin
> cc_compiler : gcc (GCC) 4.4.6 20120305 (Red Hat 4.4.6-4)
> cc_compile_by : mockbuild
> cc_compile_domain : crc.id.au
> cc_compile_date : Sat Feb 16 19:16:38 EST 2013
> xend_config_format : 4
>
> In a nutshell, does anyone know *why* I am only able to get ~50Mb/sec
> sequential writes to the DomU? It certainly isn't a problem getting
> normal speeds to the LV while mounted in the Dom0.
>
> All OS are Scientific Linux 6.3. The Dom0 runs packages from my
> kernel-xen repo (http://au1.mirror.crc.id.au/repo/el6/x86_64/). The DomU
> is completely stock packages.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-20 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-20 2:10 4.2.1: Poor write performance for DomU Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 8:26 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2013-02-20 8:49 ` Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 9:49 ` Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-20 11:06 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-20 11:08 ` Steven Haigh
2013-02-20 12:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-02-20 13:18 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2013-03-08 20:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-08 8:54 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-08 9:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-03-08 9:46 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-08 9:54 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-03-08 20:49 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-08 22:30 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-11 13:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-11 13:37 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-12 13:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-12 14:08 ` Steven Haigh
[not found] ` <514EA337.7030303@crc.id.au>
[not found] ` <514EA6B0.8010504@crc.id.au>
[not found] ` <514EA741.7050403@crc.id.au>
2013-03-24 9:10 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-24 9:54 ` Steven Haigh
2013-03-25 2:21 ` Steven Haigh
2013-08-20 16:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-20 18:25 ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-05 8:28 ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-06 13:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-09-06 23:06 ` Steven Haigh
2013-09-06 23:37 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=512488AC.1020702@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=netwiz@crc.id.au \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).