From: Xu Zhang <xzhang@cs.uic.edu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
gm281@cam.ac.uk, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: check against nested events and try to fix up
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 21:53:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5140144F.6020102@cs.uic.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513FE798.7040409@uic.edu>
On 3/12/2013 6:42 PM, Xu Zhang wrote:
> Basically both approaches are correct to me and do the same job.
> Xen-Linux 32bit is definitely a more neat solution. However, one thing
> to notice is that mini-os x86 32bit also uses a fixup table. I guess
> we could apply these patches as a temporary solution to make sure
> everything is correct and consistent, and having following patches to
> do the refinement.
Ah, somewhat "consistent". :-) And by refinement I mean refinement on
both 32bit and 64bit mini-os x86 kernel entries: basically replacing use
of look up table with Xen-Linux x86-32bit's approach.
Thanks,
- Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-13 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-08 21:30 [PATCH 0/6] mini-os: check and fix up against nested events in x86-64 kernel entry Xu Zhang
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: code clean-ups Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 20:57 ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: define macros for registers partial save and restore Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 20:55 ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: code refactoring; no functional changes Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 21:03 ` Samuel Thibault
2013-04-11 4:40 ` Xu Zhang
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: remove unnecessary event blocking Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 21:07 ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-15 20:16 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-11 4:40 ` Xu Zhang
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: defer RESTORE_REST until return Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 21:15 ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-08 21:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] mini-os/x86-64 entry: check against nested events and try to fix up Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 21:19 ` Samuel Thibault
2013-03-13 2:42 ` Xu Zhang
2013-03-09 22:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2013-03-13 2:42 ` Xu Zhang
2013-03-13 5:53 ` Xu Zhang [this message]
2013-03-14 1:09 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5140144F.6020102@cs.uic.edu \
--to=xzhang@cs.uic.edu \
--cc=gm281@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).