From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/traces Acked patches. Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:37:27 +0000 Message-ID: <51506F37.70600@eu.citrix.com> References: <1364222482-14697-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <515077C402000078000C830A@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <515077C402000078000C830A@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel , Ian Jackson , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 25/03/13 15:13, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 25.03.13 at 15:41, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >> Please commit these patches. I can also put these on a git tree >> (if you could create on for me on xenbits.org that is it) for a git pull. >> >> >> The trace patches have been Acked-by George. > You know what - I didn't apply them precisely because the ack > came through only for patches 3 and 4. I just checked the > xen-devel archives again, and that's the state of affairs right > now too. Possibly the ack was sent to you without Cc-ing > xen-devel, but that doesn't allow me to apply them. Is that because I had already Ack-ed an earlier version of the same patches, as noted right above Konrad's S-o-B line? I'm not 100% sure the normal protocol, but Konrad has been around the block a few times; I would think that if Konrad put my Ack-by on something, then that should have the presumption of validity -- particularly if he cc'd me (which he did) and I didn't nack it. -George