From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suravee Suthikulanit Subject: Re: Ping: [PATCH 0/3] IOMMU errata treatment adjustments Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:49:16 -0500 Message-ID: <515071FC.8010504@amd.com> References: <51489E3A02000078000C6DB2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5150325302000078000C8098@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Andrew Cooper , Malcolm Crossley , Jacob Shin , "Zhang, Xiantao" , xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Sorry for late reply. This works looks ok and works fine. Acked. Thank you Suravee On 3/25/2013 6:11 AM, Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Sorry for late. They make sense to me. Acked! Thanks! > Xiantao > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@suse.com] >> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 6:18 PM >> To: Jacob Shin; suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com; Zhang, Xiantao >> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Malcolm Crossley; xen-devel >> Subject: Ping: [PATCH 0/3] IOMMU errata treatment adjustments >> >>>>> On 19.03.13 at 17:19, "Jan Beulich" wrote: >>> 1: IOMMU: properly check whether interrupt remapping is enabled >>> 2: AMD IOMMU: only disable when certain IVRS consistency checks fail >>> 3: VT-d: deal with 5500/5520/X58 errata >>> >>> Patch 1 and 2 are version 2 of a previously submitted, then >>> withdrawn patch following up after XSA-36. Patch 3 is version 3 of >>> a patch previously sent by Malcolm and Andrew. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich >> Maintainers of that code - any opinion? ACKs? NAKs? >> >> Thanks, Jan >