From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Guthro <Benjamin.Guthro@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/S3: Restore broken vcpu affinity on
	resume
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 12:58:09 -0400
Message-ID: <5151D3A1.9030606@citrix.com>
References: <1364314352-20280-1-git-send-email-benjamin.guthro@citrix.com>
	<5151E0E902000078000C8AAC@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5151E0E902000078000C8AAC@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org


On 03/26/2013 12:54 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> Looks reasonable to me, minus severe formatting issues (hard
> tabs being the most obvious, but not the only problem).

Thanks for the review - Apologies on the formatting.
Would you prefer I clean up the formatting and re-submit, or would you 
prefer to take care of it prior to commit


>
> I don't particularly like the increase of scope for these two, but
> I guess there aren't many alternatives.

Indeed.

My first pass at this only operated on cpupool0, which did not require 
this scope increase...but it was pointed out that was probably not 
sufficient to be acceptable in a more general solution appropriate to 
upstream.

Thanks

Ben