From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: High CPU temp, suspend problem - xen 4.1.5-pre, linux 3.7.x
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:52:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5153079E.9030802@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5153063C.8020307@citrix.com>
On 27/03/2013 14:46, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 27/03/2013 14:31, Marek Marczykowski wrote:
>> On 27.03.2013 09:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 26.03.13 at 19:50, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> So vector e9 doesn't appear to be programmed in anywhere.
>>> Quite obviously, as it's the 8259A vector for IRQ 9. The question
>>> really is why an IRQ appears on that vector in the first place. The
>>> 8259A resume code _should_ leave all IRQs masked on a fully
>>> IO-APIC system (see my question raised yesterday).
>>>
>>> And that's also why I suggested, for an experiment, to fiddle with
>>> the loop exit condition to exclude legacy vectors (which wouldn't
>>> be a final solution, but would at least tell us whether the direction
>>> is the right one). In the end, besides understanding why an
>>> interrupt on vector E9 gets raised at all, we may also need to
>>> tweak the IRQ migration logic to not do anything on legacy IRQs,
>>> but that would need to happen earlier than in
>>> smp_irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(). Considering that 4.3
>>> apparently doesn't have this problem, we may need to go hunt for
>>> a change that isn't directly connected to this, yet deals with the
>>> problem as a side effect (at least I don't recall any particular fix
>>> since 4.2). One aspect here is the double mapping of legacy IRQs
>>> (once to their IO-APIC vector, and once to their legacy vector,
>>> i.e. vector_irq[] having two entries pointing to the same IRQ).
>> So tried change loop condition to LAST_DYNAMIC_VECTOR and it doesn't hit that
>> BUG/ASSERT. But still it doesn't work - only CPU0 used by scheduler, also some
>> errors from dom0 kernel, and errors about PCI devices used by domU(1).
>>
>> Messages from resume (different tries):
>> http://duch.mimuw.edu.pl/~marmarek/qubes/xen-4.1-last-dynamic-vector.log
>> http://duch.mimuw.edu.pl/~marmarek/qubes/xen-4.1-last-dynamic-vector2.log
>>
>> Also one time I've got fatal page fault error, earlier in resume (it isn't
>> deterministic):
>> http://duch.mimuw.edu.pl/~marmarek/qubes/xen-4.1-resume-page-fault.log
>>
> This pagefault is a Null structure pointer dereference, likely the
> scheduling data. At a first glance, it looks related to the assertion
> failures I have been seeing sporadically in testing, but unable to
> reproduce reliably. There seems to be something quite dodgy with
> interaction of vcpu_wake and scheduling loops.
>
> The other logs indicate that dom0 appears to have a domain id of 1,
> which is sure to cause problems.
Actually - ignore this
>From the log,
(XEN) physdev.c:153: dom0: can't create irq for msi!
[ 113.637037] xhci_hcd 0000:03:00.0: xen map irq failed -22 for 32752
domain
(XEN) physdev.c:153: dom0: can't create irq for msi!
[ 113.657911] xhci_hcd 0000:03:00.0: xen map irq failed -22 for 32752
domain
and later
(XEN) physdev.c:153: dom1: can't create irq for msi!
[ 121.909814] pciback 0000:00:19.0: xen map irq failed -22 for 1 domain
[ 121.954080] error enable msi for guest 1 status ffffffea
(XEN) physdev.c:153: dom1: can't create irq for msi!
[ 122.035355] pciback 0000:00:19.0: xen map irq failed -22 for 1 domain
[ 122.044421] error enable msi for guest 1 status ffffffea
I think that there is a separate bug where mapped irqs are not unmapped
on the suspend path.
>
> As for locating the cause of the legacy vectors, it might be a good idea
> to stick a printk at the top of do_IRQ() which indicates an interrupt
> with vector between 0xe0 and 0xef. This might at least indicate whether
> legacy vectors are genuinely being delivered, or whether we have some
> memory corruption causing these effects.
>
> ~Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-27 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-13 20:50 High CPU temp, suspend problem - xen 4.1.5-pre, linux 3.7.x Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-15 3:00 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-03-15 3:22 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-15 13:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-22 15:34 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-22 16:56 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 11:36 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-25 14:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-25 14:56 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-26 12:17 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-26 13:11 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-26 13:50 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-26 15:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-26 16:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-26 16:47 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-26 16:03 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-26 16:45 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-26 17:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-26 17:42 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-26 17:54 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-26 18:21 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-26 18:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-27 8:50 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-27 8:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-27 8:52 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-27 9:03 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-27 14:01 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-27 14:31 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-27 14:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-27 14:49 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-27 15:51 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-27 16:27 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-27 18:16 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-27 18:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-28 14:43 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-28 10:50 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 11:53 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-28 12:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 13:19 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-27 14:52 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-03-27 15:47 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-27 16:56 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-27 17:15 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-28 17:41 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-28 17:44 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-28 17:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-03-29 0:26 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-28 16:13 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 19:03 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-04-01 13:53 ` Ben Guthro
2013-04-02 1:13 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-04-02 14:05 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-15 22:09 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-04-15 23:36 ` Ben Guthro
2013-04-15 23:51 ` konrad wilk
2013-04-16 0:19 ` Ben Guthro
2013-04-16 0:46 ` Ben Guthro
2013-04-16 3:20 ` konrad wilk
2013-04-16 1:02 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-04-16 8:47 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-16 11:49 ` Ben Guthro
2013-04-16 11:57 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-16 12:09 ` Ben Guthro
2013-04-16 12:51 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 16:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 16:31 ` Marek Marczykowski
2013-03-28 16:52 ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 17:09 ` Marek Marczykowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5153079E.9030802@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).