From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Marek Marczykowski <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: irq_move_cleanup_interrupt() must ignore legacy vectors
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:29:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <515461EA.509@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51546EB902000078000C95B2@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 28/03/2013 15:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Since the main loop in the function includes legacy vectors, and since
> vector_irq[] gets set up for legacy vectors regardless of whether those
> get handled through the IO-APIC, it must not do anything on this vector
> range. In fact, we should never get here for IRQs not handled through
> the IO-APIC, so add a respective assertion at once. For that assertion
> to not have false positives we however need to suppress setting up IRQ2
> as an 8259A interrupt (which wasn't correct anyway).
>
> Furthermore, there's no point iterating over the vectors past
> LAST_HIPRIORITY_VECTOR, so terminate the loop accordingly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/i8259.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/i8259.c
> @@ -416,6 +416,8 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void)
> for (irq = 0; platform_legacy_irq(irq); irq++) {
> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>
> + if ( irq == 2 ) /* IRQ2 doesn't exist */
> + continue;
> desc->handler = &i8259A_irq_type;
> per_cpu(vector_irq, cpu)[FIRST_LEGACY_VECTOR + irq] = irq;
> cpumask_copy(desc->arch.cpu_mask, cpumask_of(cpu));
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
> @@ -616,7 +616,9 @@ void irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(struct c
> ack_APIC_irq();
>
> me = smp_processor_id();
> - for (vector = FIRST_DYNAMIC_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
> + for ( vector = FIRST_DYNAMIC_VECTOR;
> + vector <= LAST_HIPRIORITY_VECTOR; vector++)
> + {
> unsigned int irq;
> unsigned int irr;
> struct irq_desc *desc;
> @@ -625,6 +627,12 @@ void irq_move_cleanup_interrupt(struct c
> if ((int)irq < 0)
> continue;
>
> + if ( vector >= FIRST_LEGACY_VECTOR && vector <= LAST_LEGACY_VECTOR )
> + {
> + ASSERT(IO_APIC_IRQ(irq));
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> if (!desc)
> continue;
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-28 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 15:24 [PATCH] x86: irq_move_cleanup_interrupt() must ignore legacy vectors Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 15:29 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-03-28 19:58 ` Keir Fraser
2013-04-02 6:25 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=515461EA.509@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).