From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v13] claim and its friends for allocating multiple self-ballooning guests Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:10:32 +0100 Message-ID: <515ABCA8.3060101@eu.citrix.com> References: <1364417739-10121-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com> <20820.29904.715649.930684@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20820.29904.715649.930684@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: Dan Magenheimer , "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Ian Campbell , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 28/03/13 16:50, Ian Jackson wrote: > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("[PATCH v13] claim and its friends for allocating multiple self-ballooning guests"): >> The patch (mmu: Introduce XENMEM_claim_pages (subop of memory ops) >> is already in the hypervisor and described in details the >> problem/solution/alternative solutions. This builds upon that new >> hypercall to expand the toolstack to use it. > I've reviewed this series now and it's looking close. > > When we get to a final version that I'm happy with I would like to get > an opinion from Ian C before actually committing it. He's away until > after feature freeze, but you've posted this already several times > before the freeze and I expect the final version to make it before > George declares code freeze. I was planning on extending the code freeze for a week for exactly this kind of reason. -George