Re: Xen 4.3 development update

[George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>]

On 03/04/13 08:27, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 02.04.13 at 18:34, Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org> wrote:
>> At 16:42 +0100 on 02 Apr (1364920927), Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 02.04.13 at 16:07, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> * AMD NPT performance regression after c/s 24770:7f79475d3de7
>>>>    owner: ?
>>>>    Reference: http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=135075376805215
>>> This is supposedly fixed with the RTC changes Tim committed the
>>> other day. Suravee, is that correct?
>> This is a separate problem.  IIRC the AMD XP perf issue is caused by the
>> emulation of LAPIC TPR accesses slowing down with Andres's p2m locking
>> patches.  XP doesn't have 'lazy IRQL' or support for CR8, so it takes a
>> _lot_ of vmexits for IRQL reads and writes.
> Ah, okay, sorry for mixing this up. But how is this a regression
> then?

My sense, when I looked at this back whenever that there was much more 
to this.  The XP IRQL updating is a problem, but it's made terribly 
worse by the changset in question.  It seemed to me like the kind of 
thing that would be caused by TLB or caches suddenly becoming much less 
effective.

  -George