xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: sherry.hurwitz@amd.com, Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>,
	xiantao.zhang@intel.com, xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86/IOMMU: multi-vector MSI prerequisites
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:51:28 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51661720.5040702@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5165975002000078000CC256@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 4/10/2013 9:46 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 10.04.13 at 16:38, Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> wrote:
>> On 4/10/2013 8:55 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Suravee,
>>>
>>> did you have a chance to retry with the v2 patch indicated above,
>>> or to gain understanding on the points mentioned above. I'm
>>> afraid I won't be able to make any progress (or propose any
>>> fixes) without your help here, and we'd really like to have multi-
>>> vector MSI support ready for 4.3...
>>>
>> Sorry I didn't see the patch.  Let me try that and get back to you today.
> And irrespective of the patch (which fixes another issue, and
> I suppose that's not connected to the problem you saw), did
> you find an explanation why the IOMMU lookup in the MSI
> message read path would fail, when the same lookup in the MSI
> message write path obviously succeeds?
>
> Jan
>
Jan,

- From drivers/passthrough/amd/iommu_init.c: enable_iommu(), the 
enabling code tries to set MSI affinity for IOMMU.
- From xen/arch/x86/msi.c: set_msi_affinity(), the code tries to 
"read_msi_msg()" which eventually calls "amd_iommu_read_msi_from_ire()".
- Please note that the "amd_iommu_read_msi_from_ire()" was originally 
empty prior the patch.
- From the patch, the new code try to call "get_intremap_entry()", which 
is the function that was asserting due to table is NULL.

Here, the MSI read message was sent to read IOMMU registers.  Since the 
message is targeting for IOMMU itself (bdf 0x2 in this case), it should 
not be remapped.  That is why I believe the interrupt remapping table is 
empty.

Let me know what you think.

Suravee
-

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-11  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-26  8:51 [PATCH 0/4] x86/IOMMU: multi-vector MSI prerequisites Jan Beulich
2013-03-26  9:03 ` [PATCH 1/4] IOMMU: allow MSI message to IRTE propagation to fail Jan Beulich
2013-03-27 11:45   ` George Dunlap
2013-03-27 12:16     ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-27 14:45       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-03-27 14:55       ` George Dunlap
2013-03-28  8:25         ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28  9:46           ` Tim Deegan
2013-03-28  9:49             ` George Dunlap
2013-03-28 10:33           ` George Dunlap
2013-03-28 11:14             ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 11:25               ` Tim Deegan
2013-03-28 11:39               ` George Dunlap
2013-03-28 13:47               ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-06 20:25               ` Is: git send-email, patch sending, etc Was: " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-05-07  8:53                 ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-07  9:26                 ` Wei Liu
2013-05-07 14:03                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-03-27 17:26   ` George Dunlap
2013-03-28  8:27     ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-26  9:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/MSI: cleanup to prepare for multi-vector MSI Jan Beulich
2013-03-26  9:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] AMD IOMMU: allocate IRTE entries instead of using a static mapping Jan Beulich
2013-04-02  8:38   ` [PATCH v2 " Jan Beulich
2013-04-11  0:34     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-03-26  9:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] AMD IOMMU: untie remap and vector maps Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 12:37   ` George Dunlap
2013-03-28 13:09     ` Jan Beulich
2013-03-28 13:40       ` George Dunlap
2013-03-29  5:18 ` [PATCH 0/4] x86/IOMMU: multi-vector MSI prerequisites Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-03-29  5:45   ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-04-02  8:39     ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-10 13:55       ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-10 14:38         ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-10 14:46           ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-11  1:51             ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2013-04-11  7:13               ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-11 15:40                 ` suravee suthikulpanit
2013-04-11 16:11                   ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51661720.5040702@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
    --cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=xiantao.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).