From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: jacob.shin@amd.com, haitao.shan@intel.com,
jun.nakajima@intel.com, dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] x86/AMD: Read VPMU MSRs from context when it is not loaded into HW
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 14:30:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51670F53.6000403@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51670247.1090409@oracle.com>
On 4/11/2013 1:34 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 04/11/2013 02:26 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> Boris,
>>
>> I tried booting the guest HVM after the patch, I still see PERF only
>> working in Software mode only. I'll look more into this.
>
> You may need to declare proper CPUID bits in the config file. On
> fam15h I have
>
> cpuid=['0x80000001:ecx=00000001101000011000101111110011']
>
> -boris
Yes, that's working now. Thanks.
Suravee
>
>>
>> Suravee
>> On 4/9/2013 12:26 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> Mark context as LOADED on any MSR write (and on vpmu_restore()). This
>>> will allow us to know whether to read an MSR from HW or from context:
>>> guest may write into an MSR without enabling it (thus not marking the
>>> context as RUNNING) and then be migrated. Reading this MSR again will
>>> not match the pervious write since registers will not be loaded into
>>> HW.
>>>
>>> In addition, we should be saving the context when it is LOADED, not
>>> RUNNING --- otherwise we need to save it any time it becomes
>>> non-RUNNING,
>>> which may be a frequent occurrence.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c | 48
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
>>> index f194975..3115923 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/vpmu.c
>>> @@ -225,6 +225,8 @@ static void amd_vpmu_restore(struct vcpu *v)
>>> context_restore(v);
>>> apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, ctxt->hw_lapic_lvtpc);
>>> +
>>> + vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
>>> }
>>> static inline void context_save(struct vcpu *v)
>>> @@ -246,7 +248,7 @@ static void amd_vpmu_save(struct vcpu *v)
>>> struct amd_vpmu_context *ctx = vpmu->context;
>>> if ( !(vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_ALLOCATED) &&
>>> - vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_RUNNING)) )
>>> + vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED)) )
>>> return;
>>> context_save(v);
>>> @@ -256,6 +258,35 @@ static void amd_vpmu_save(struct vcpu *v)
>>> ctx->hw_lapic_lvtpc = apic_read(APIC_LVTPC);
>>> apic_write(APIC_LVTPC, ctx->hw_lapic_lvtpc | APIC_LVT_MASKED);
>>> + vpmu_reset(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void context_read(unsigned int msr, u64 *msr_content)
>>> +{
>>> + unsigned int i;
>>> + struct vcpu *v = current;
>>> + struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
>>> + struct amd_vpmu_context *ctxt = vpmu->context;
>>> +
>>> + if ( k7_counters_mirrored &&
>>> + ((msr >= MSR_K7_EVNTSEL0) && (msr <= MSR_K7_PERFCTR3)) )
>>> + {
>>> + msr = get_fam15h_addr(msr);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + for ( i = 0; i < num_counters; i++ )
>>> + {
>>> + if ( msr == ctrls[i] )
>>> + {
>>> + *msr_content = ctxt->ctrls[i];
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> + else if (msr == counters[i] )
>>> + {
>>> + *msr_content = ctxt->counters[i];
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> }
>>> static void context_update(unsigned int msr, u64 msr_content)
>>> @@ -318,6 +349,12 @@ static int amd_vpmu_do_wrmsr(unsigned int msr,
>>> uint64_t msr_content)
>>> release_pmu_ownship(PMU_OWNER_HVM);
>>> }
>>> + if ( !vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) )
>>> + {
>>> + context_restore(v);
>>> + vpmu_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> /* Update vpmu context immediately */
>>> context_update(msr, msr_content);
>>> @@ -328,7 +365,14 @@ static int amd_vpmu_do_wrmsr(unsigned int
>>> msr, uint64_t msr_content)
>>> static int amd_vpmu_do_rdmsr(unsigned int msr, uint64_t
>>> *msr_content)
>>> {
>>> - rdmsrl(msr, *msr_content);
>>> + struct vcpu *v = current;
>>> + struct vpmu_struct *vpmu = vcpu_vpmu(v);
>>> +
>>> + if ( !vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CONTEXT_LOADED) )
>>> + context_read(msr, msr_content);
>>> + else
>>> + rdmsrl(msr, *msr_content);
>>> +
>>> return 1;
>>> }
>>
>>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-11 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-09 17:26 [PATCH 0/8] Various VPMU patches Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/8] x86/AMD: Allow more fine-grained control of VMCB MSR Permission Map Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/8] x86/AMD: Do not intercept access to performance counters MSRs Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-10 13:25 ` Jan Beulich
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 3/8] x86/AMD: Read VPMU MSRs from context when it is not loaded into HW Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-11 18:26 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-04-11 18:34 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-11 19:30 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit [this message]
2013-04-16 15:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-04-16 17:12 ` Jacob Shin
2013-04-16 18:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-19 22:56 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-19 23:32 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-06-19 23:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 4/8] x86/AMD: Stop counters on VPMU save Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 5/8] x86/VPMU: Add Haswell support Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 6/8] x86/VPMU: Factor out VPMU common code Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-10 16:03 ` Nakajima, Jun
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 7/8] x86/VPMU: Save/restore VPMU only when necessary Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-10 8:57 ` Dietmar Hahn
2013-04-10 12:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86/AMD: Clean up context_update() in AMD VPMU code Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-11 19:48 ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-04-11 20:42 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2013-04-10 8:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] Various VPMU patches Dietmar Hahn
2013-04-10 18:49 ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-04-10 19:10 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51670F53.6000403@amd.com \
--to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=haitao.shan@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).