From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Security disclosure process discussion update Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:02:41 +0100 Message-ID: <5177BBD1.5070209@eu.citrix.com> References: <1366037716.8399.65.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <516D4CB5.1040301@eu.citrix.com> <1366121624.16851.23.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <1366400507.29403.5.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1366400507.29403.5.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 19/04/13 20:41, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 15:13 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 14:05 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >>> On 15/04/13 15:55, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>> Asking them to setup xen-security-team@distro.org seems a bit of a >>>> burden >>> I'm just curious, is it really that much of a burden? If Debian, for >>> example, already has infrastructure to accept >>> "@packages.debian.org", how much extra work is it to add >>> "-security@debian.org"? >> For just one $package its probably still a moderate amount of work. I > Ian J pointed out to me IRL that this is the sort of thing alioth (the > Debian Source/FusionForge instance) ought to be able to provide and I > can see an interface which purports to allow me to create a private list > on there (but I've not tried it). > > Not sure about other distros but this seems to solve it for Debian at > least. How about the following: The addition of individual e-mail addresses for an organization in addition to the organizational e-mail address will be considered in exceptional circumstances; for example, if the maintainer for the xen package is not on the organization's security e-mail list, and either maintaining a separate list or having those on the list act as an intermediary would be too onerous. -George