From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Security disclosure process discussion update Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 16:31:53 +0100 Message-ID: <51813569.7010705@eu.citrix.com> References: <1366037716.8399.65.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com> <516D4CB5.1040301@eu.citrix.com> <1366121624.16851.23.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <1366400507.29403.5.camel@dagon.hellion.org.uk> <5177BBD1.5070209@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5177BBD1.5070209@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 24/04/13 12:02, George Dunlap wrote: > On 19/04/13 20:41, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 15:13 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 14:05 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: >>>> On 15/04/13 15:55, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>>> Asking them to setup xen-security-team@distro.org seems a bit of a >>>>> burden >>>> I'm just curious, is it really that much of a burden? If Debian, for >>>> example, already has infrastructure to accept >>>> "@packages.debian.org", how much extra work is it to add >>>> "-security@debian.org"? >>> For just one $package its probably still a moderate amount of work. I >> Ian J pointed out to me IRL that this is the sort of thing alioth (the >> Debian Source/FusionForge instance) ought to be able to provide and I >> can see an interface which purports to allow me to create a private list >> on there (but I've not tried it). >> >> Not sure about other distros but this seems to solve it for Debian at >> least. > How about the following: > > The addition of individual e-mail addresses for > an organization in addition to the organizational e-mail address > will be considered in exceptional circumstances; for example, if > the maintainer for the xen package is not on the organization's > security e-mail list, and either maintaining a separate list or > having those on the list act as an intermediary would be too > onerous. Ping? I'd like to get the vote started on this in the next week or two. -George