From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: Test report for xen-unstable and qemu-xen
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 16:20:18 +0100
Message-ID: <518BBEB2.7040805@eu.citrix.com>
References: <518A6537.1060608@tiscali.it> <20130509121502.GI11427@reaktio.net>
	<518BA483.6030902@tiscali.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <518BA483.6030902@tiscali.it>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: "fantonifabio@tiscali.it" <fantonifabio@tiscali.it>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On 09/05/13 14:28, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>>
>>
>>> - tools: Improve make deb
>>>
>> Is this needed in upstream Xen?
> I thing is very useful, it helps me to save a lot of time onhundreds 
> of tests build that I've done.
> I think that now without this make debball is unusable, I think that 
> atleast these parts must be applied:
> - Remove version from installed package name for correct update
> - Add conffiles to manage main config files on package update
>
> I already posted it but rejected :(
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-02/msg02483.html

Yes, as we said in the discussions, we don't want the output of "make 
debball" useable as a full-fledged Debian package.  The general 
consensus (IIRC) was that we'd be happy if someone were to step up and 
maintain such a set of packages, however.

>>
>>> -------------------------
>>> New issue:
>>> - nested hvm probably bugged: started test it on windows 7 pro 64
>>> domU on qemu-xen,
>>>    xpmode crash on install without show any error, nor error on logs
>>> even if havdetection
>>>    completes  with success
>>> -------------
>>>
>> George: Should we track this nested hvm issue on the Xen 4.3 status 
>> emails?

This needs a proper report -- it doesn't say what cpu is being used.

>>
>>
>>> -------------------------
>>> Old issue:
>>> - Network is not working after restore on Windows domU with qemu-xen
>>> and gplpv
>>>    Workaround: fixed mac address since it changes after each restore
>>>
>> And also this one?

I'll put this on my list.  Not sure if this will be a release blocker, 
we'll see.

  -George