From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Ross Philipson <ross.philipson@citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH (V9) 0/2] Add V4V to Xen
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:08:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A77964.6000500@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369915658.13087.91.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 30/05/13 13:07, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
> No patch to docs/... at all? The hypercall interface docs have improved
> (although they still aren't great IMHO) but what's really needed is an
> overview of the design and a "how do I actually use this" type thing.
I agree. I'm looking at inter-domain communication mechanisms for use
in XenServer and it's not obvious how to use v4v securely.
e.g., when a previously trusted domain (A) is compromised it may spam a
domain (B) with messages in a DoS attack. The per source domain/port
receive rings help here as the domain A will not be able to block B from
receiving traffic from other domains.
But how are these per-connection rings created? This seems to require
out-of-band signaling for connection setup. I suppose this could be via
v4v and a connection manager service running in a known and trusted
domain. But how does a domain find the connection manager service and
how does it handle the connection management domain being restarted?
The other big question I have is why v4v? v4v doesn't seem to offer any
advantages over using shared rings like libvchan.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-30 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-28 19:43 [PATCH (V9) 0/2] Add V4V to Xen Ross Philipson
2013-05-28 19:43 ` [PATCH (V9) 1/2] xen: events, exposes evtchn_alloc_unbound_domain Ross Philipson
2013-05-28 19:43 ` [PATCH (V9) 2/2] xen: Add V4V implementation Ross Philipson
2013-05-29 0:43 ` Matt Wilson
2013-05-29 19:28 ` Ross Philipson
2013-05-29 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-29 19:26 ` Ross Philipson
2013-05-30 5:16 ` Jan Beulich
2013-05-29 9:56 ` Vincent Hanquez
2013-05-30 16:20 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-04 18:01 ` Ross Philipson
2013-06-10 15:06 ` David Vrabel
2013-05-30 11:57 ` [PATCH (V9) 0/2] Add V4V to Xen Ian Campbell
2013-05-31 7:36 ` Vincent Hanquez
2013-05-31 7:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-31 8:56 ` Vincent Hanquez
2013-05-31 9:01 ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-31 9:26 ` Vincent Hanquez
2013-05-31 16:29 ` Ross Philipson
2013-05-31 16:38 ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-30 12:07 ` Ian Campbell
2013-05-30 16:08 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-05-31 7:25 ` Vincent Hanquez
2013-05-31 10:21 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A77964.6000500@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ross.philipson@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).