From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] AMD/intremap: Prevent use of per-device vector maps until irq logic is fixed
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 16:41:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ACB925.7040300@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ACD22102000078000DA9D3@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 03/06/13 16:28, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 03.06.13 at 17:17, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>> On 03/06/13 16:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 03.06.13 at 16:35, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> As I said, this reverts to the behaviour before XSA-36, but without the
>>>> security issue of a single IOMMU interrupt remapping table. Before
>>>> XSA-36, all AMD systems were limited in vector range because of the
>>>> global used_vector map.
>>> Right, so you'd trade one regression for another (less severe, but
>>> anyway).
>> Absolutely, especially when it comes to trying to fix a regression we
>> have pushed out in a security fix.
>>
>> Ideally a proper fix to MSI-X issue can be found, but failing a timely
>> fix, reverting to the pre XSA-36 behaviour but without the security
>> issue is a good solution.
> Just to repeat - "can be found" is the wrong term, as we already
> have a patch pending that - from all I can tell - would take care of
> the problem (and you not stating anything to the contrary makes
> me assume you agree).
>
> Jan
I would agree that it looks to fix the underlying issue.
It is however quite a large change to a subtle part of the code, which
makes me hesitant about declaring it a good backport candidate for
previous versions.
~Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-31 20:04 [PATCH v2] AMD/intremap: Prevent use of per-device vector maps until irq logic is fixed Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 14:07 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 14:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 15:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 15:17 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-03 15:28 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-03 15:41 ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-06-04 13:12 ` George Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ACB925.7040300@citrix.com \
--to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jacob.shin@amd.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).