From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/pci: Deal with toolstack missing an 'XenbusStateClosing'.
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:36:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B743EA.5020800@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370898399-20968-2-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
On 06/10/2013 10:06 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> There are two tool-stack that can instruct the Xen PCI frontend
> and backend to change states: 'xm' (Python code with a daemon),
> and 'xl' (C library - does not keep state changes).
>
> With the 'xm', the path to disconnect a PCI device (xm pci-detach
> <guest> <BDF>)is:
>
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)->5(Closing*).
>
> The * is for states that the tool-stack sets. For 'xl', it is similar:
>
> 4(Connected)->7(Reconfiguring*)-> 8(Reconfigured)-> 4(Connected)
>
> Both of them also tear down the XenBus structure, so the backend
> state ends up going in the 3(Initialised) and calls pcifront_xenbus_remove.
So I looked a little bit into this; there are actually two different
states that happen as part of this handshake. In order to disonnect a
*device*, xl signals using the *bus* state, like this:
* Wait for the *bus* to be in state 4(Connected)
* Set the *device* state to 5(Closing)
* Set the *bus* state to 7(Reconfiguring)
* Wait for the *bus* state to return to 4(Connected)
So are all of these states you see the *bus* state? And why would you
disconnect the whole pci bus if you're only removing one device?
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 15:45 xl pci-detach vs xm pci-detach in Xen 4.3 (one works, the other does not) Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 11:12 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-10 11:15 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-10 13:20 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 13:28 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-10 13:30 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-10 20:24 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 20:30 ` Processed: " xen
[not found] ` <20131104202224.GA18449@phenom.dumpdata.com>
2013-11-04 20:30 ` Processed: " xen
2013-11-04 20:39 ` Wei Liu
2013-11-04 20:45 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-10 21:06 ` (unknown), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-10 21:06 ` [PATCH] xen/pci: Deal with toolstack missing an 'XenbusStateClosing' Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-11 7:29 ` Jan Beulich
[not found] ` <51B6EDDF02000078000DCFB7@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
2013-06-11 9:00 ` George Dunlap
[not found] ` <51B6E711.2000001@eu.citrix.com>
2013-06-11 13:03 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 15:36 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-06-11 16:08 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 16:17 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 16:24 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-12 13:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 13:47 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-12 14:27 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 17:28 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-14 16:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-04 20:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-04 20:56 ` Ben Guthro
[not found] ` <20131104205917.GA18696@phenom.dumpdata.com>
2013-11-04 21:15 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-10 13:30 ` Processed: Re: xl pci-detach vs xm pci-detach in Xen 4.3 (one works, the other does not) xen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B743EA.5020800@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).