From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:14:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B74CE1.306@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CDDD0B0B.29BC3%keir.xen@gmail.com>
On 11/06/13 18:12, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 16:59, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>> Hmm I can't find any confirmation that my patch actually *did* work. :( I'm
>>> sure I remember testing it though!
>>>
>>> My suggestion is we do indeed remove the inner if() in latch_shinfo_size().
>>> Ie. Call update_domain_wallclock_time() even if shinfo size has apparently
>>> not changed.
>>>
>>> We only latch shinfo size on hypercall page initialisation and on setup of
>>> the callback irq. They are start-of-day/resume operations, so removing the
>>> if() should have no bad side effect that I can see. If nothing else it
>>> should make this wallclock-field setup more robust.
>>
>> So it would be better to call update_domain_wallclock_time
>> unconditionally on latch_shinfo_size rather than doing it on
>> XENMAPSPACE_shared_info?
>>
>> Conceptially it makes more sense IMHO to do it in the call to
>> XENMAPSPACE_shared_info.
>
> I would still make the fix in latch_shinfo_size() and perhaps add an extra
> call to latch_shinfo_size() from the call to XENMAPSPACE_shared_info. But
> actually I am sure you will find it unnecessary and at this point for Xen
> 4.3 I think the smallest possible patch wins.
ACK, will resend the patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-11 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-11 10:46 [PATCH] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration Roger Pau Monne
2013-06-11 11:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 12:01 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 12:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 13:59 ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-11 14:04 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 13:36 ` Egger, Christoph
2013-06-11 12:17 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 13:15 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 14:02 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 13:38 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 14:16 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 14:41 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-11 15:05 ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-11 15:45 ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-11 15:59 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 16:12 ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-11 16:14 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2013-06-11 15:59 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 13:50 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 13:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2013-06-11 15:50 ` Keir Fraser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B74CE1.306@citrix.com \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).