xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@gmail.com>
Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>,
	Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 19:09:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B767E0.6050007@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CDDD16CF.29C15%keir.xen@gmail.com>

On 11/06/13 18:02, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 17:41, "Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>> Call update_domain_wallclock_time on hvm_latch_shinfo_size even if
>> the bitness of the guest has already been set, this fixes the problem
>> with the wallclock not being set for PVHVM guests on resume from
>> migration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
>> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
>> Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>
>> Cc: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> May as well write directly into d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo and get rid of
> new_has_32bit. But apart from that:
>
> Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>

Yikes - we have had a patch in the XenServer patch queue for donkeys
years which implements the same fix as this.

I had still not manage to decide whether it was a gross hack which we
needed to discard or whether it needed upstreaming.

I guess this answers the question.

~Andrew

>
>> ---
>> Since this is a bug fix, I think it is suitable for inclusion in the
>> 4.3 release, and backported to older releases.
>> ---
>>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c |   20 ++++++--------------
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> index a962ce2..0dcfd81 100644
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
>> @@ -3404,21 +3404,13 @@ static void hvm_latch_shinfo_size(struct domain *d)
>>       */
>>      if ( current->domain == d ) {
>>          new_has_32bit = (hvm_guest_x86_mode(current) != 8);
>> -        if (new_has_32bit != d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo) {
>> +        if (new_has_32bit != d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo)
>>              d->arch.has_32bit_shinfo = new_has_32bit;
>> -            /*
>> -             * Make sure that the timebase in the shared info
>> -             * structure is correct for its new bit-ness.  We should
>> -             * arguably try to convert the other fields as well, but
>> -             * that's much more problematic (e.g. what do you do if
>> -             * you're going from 64 bit to 32 bit and there's an event
>> -             * channel pending which doesn't exist in the 32 bit
>> -             * version?).  Just setting the wallclock time seems to be
>> -             * sufficient for everything we do, even if it is a bit of
>> -             * a hack.
>> -             */
>> -            update_domain_wallclock_time(d);
>> -        }
>> +        /*
>> +         * Make sure that the timebase in the shared info
>> +         * structure is correct.
>> +         */
>> +        update_domain_wallclock_time(d);
>>      }
>>  }
>>  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-11 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-11 16:41 [PATCH v2] xen: fix initialization of wallclock time for PVHVM on migration Roger Pau Monne
2013-06-11 17:02 ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-11 18:09   ` Andrew Cooper [this message]
2013-06-12  7:41     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 11:25       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-12  9:36     ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-12 11:29       ` Andrew Cooper
2013-06-12  7:42   ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 10:06 ` George Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B767E0.6050007@citrix.com \
    --to=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir.xen@gmail.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).