From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
konrad wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: Xen 4.3 + tmem = Xen BUG at domain_page.c:143
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 14:16:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B874A4.8070906@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B881BD02000078000DD907@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 12/06/13 13:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 12.06.13 at 13:00, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> create ^
>> title it map_domain_page second-stage emergency fallback path never taken
>> thanks
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 7:52 PM, konrad wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>> The BUG_ON() here is definitely valid - a few lines down, after the
>>>> enclosing if(), we use it in ways that requires this to not have
>>>> triggered. It basically tells you whether an in range idx was found,
>>>> which apparently isn't the case here.
>>>>
>>>> As I think George already pointed out - printing accum here would
>>>> be quite useful: It should have at least one of the low 32 bits set,
>>>> given that dcache->entries must be at most 32 according to the
>>>> data you already got logged.
>>>
>>> With extra debugging (see attached patch)
>>>
>>> (XEN) domain_page.c:125:d1 mfn: 1eb483, [0]: bffff1ff, ~ffffffff40000e00,
>>> idx: 9 garbage: 40000e00, inuse: ffffffff
>>> (XEN) domain_page.c:125:d1 mfn: 1eb480, [0]: fdbfffff, ~ffffffff02400000,
>>> idx: 22 garbage: 2400000, inuse: ffffffff
>>> (XEN) domain_page.c:125:d1 mfn: 2067ca, [0]: fffff7ff, ~ffffffff00000800,
>>> idx: 11 garbage: 800, inuse: ffffffff
>>> (XEN) domain_page.c:125:d1 mfn: 183642, [0]: ffffffff, ~ffffffff00000000,
>>> idx: 32 garbage: 0, inuse: ffffffff
>> So regardless of the fact that tmem is obviously holding what are
>> supposed to be short-term references for so long, there is something
>> that seems not quite right about this failure path.
>>
>> It looks like the algorithm is:
>> 1. Clean the garbage map and update the inuse list
>> 2. If anything has been cleaned up, use the first not-inuse entry
>> 3. Otherwise, do something else ("replace a hash entry" -- not sure
>> exactly what that means).
>>
>> What we see above is that this failure path succeeds three times, but
>> fails the fourth time: there are, in fact, no zero entries after the
>> garbage clean-up; however, because "inuse" is 32-bit (effectively) and
>> "accum" is 64-bit, ~inuse always has bits 32-63 set, and so will
>> always return true and never fall back to the "something else"
> Right, that's what occurred to me too yesterday, but the again
> I knew I had seen this code path executed. Now that I look again,
> I think I understand why: All of my Dom0-s and typical DomU-s
> have a vCPU count divisible by 4, and with MAPCACHE_VCPU_ENTRIES
> being 16, the full unsigned long would always be used.
>
>> This is probably not something we need to fix for 4.3, but we should
>> put it on our to-do list.
> Actually I think we should fix this right away.
How often is the second path taken in practice?
And, you said this doesn't happen with debug=n builds -- why not exactly?
I'm trying to assess the actual risk of not fixing it, vs the risk of
fixing it.
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-11 13:45 Xen 4.3 + tmem = Xen BUG at domain_page.c:143 konrad wilk
2013-06-11 14:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 15:30 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 15:56 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-11 16:38 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 17:30 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 18:52 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-11 21:06 ` konrad wilk
2013-06-12 6:38 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 11:00 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-12 11:15 ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-12 11:37 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-12 12:46 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 14:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 12:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 13:16 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-06-12 13:27 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 15:11 ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-12 15:27 ` Keir Fraser
2013-06-12 15:54 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 15:48 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 17:26 ` Keir Fraser
2013-07-05 16:56 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-08 8:58 ` Jan Beulich
2013-07-08 9:07 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-08 9:15 ` Processed: " xen
2013-07-08 9:25 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-08 9:30 ` Processed: " xen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B874A4.8070906@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).