From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Massimo Canonico <mex@di.unipmn.it>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: Make note for the scheduler "cap" option warning about power management effects
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:01:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B88D38.6030601@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371049188.24512.451.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
On 12/06/13 15:59, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 09:57 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
>>> +NB: Many systems have features that will scale down the computing
>>> +power of a cpu that is not 100% utilized. This can be in the
>>> +operating system, but can also sometimes be below the operating system
>>> +in the BIOS. If you set a cap such that individual cores are running
>>> +at less than 100%, this may have an impact on the performance of your
>>> +workload over and above the impact of the cap. For example, if your
>>> +processor runs at 2GHz, and you cap a vm at 50%, the power management
>>> +system may also reduce the clock speed to 1GHz; the effect will be
>>> +that your VM gets 25% of the available power (50% of 1GHz) rather than
>>> +50% (50% of 2GHz). If you are not getting the performance you expect,
>>> +look at performance and cpufreq options in your operating system and
>>> +your BIOS.
>> Or .. use 'cpufreq=xen:performance' ?
>>
>> That should set it to the highest P state.
> I committed this already. Assuming this is a good suggestion can we get
> an incremental patch please.
Might that kind of thing be better on the wiki page?
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-12 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-11 12:31 [PATCH] docs: Make note for the scheduler "cap" option warning about power management effects George Dunlap
2013-06-11 15:32 ` Massimo Canonico
2013-06-12 8:48 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-12 8:41 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-12 9:44 ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-12 9:58 ` Dario Faggioli
2013-06-12 13:57 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-06-12 14:59 ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-12 15:01 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-06-14 18:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B88D38.6030601@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=mex@di.unipmn.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).