xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Jacob Shin <Jacob.Shin@amd.com>,
	Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v5] iommu/amd: Fix logic for clearing the IOMMU interrupt bits
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:34:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B9F481.50204@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BA082C02000078000DE0C0@nat28.tlf.novell.com>

On 6/13/2013 10:58 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 13.06.13 at 03:44, Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> wrote:
>> The following commit broke the IOMMU MSI interrupt:
>>
>> 2012-11-28    899110e3f6d2a191638e8b50a981c551eeec49e6 AMD IOMMU:
>> include IOMMU interrupt information in 'M' debug key output
>> (http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=899110e3f6d2a191638e8b5
>> 0a981c551eeec49e6)
> Having gone over the changes again, this still looks pretty innocent/
> mechanical to me - I can't see what may have got broken.
> Considering that this is the change adding respective information to
> 'M' output - what does 'M' show for the IOMMU entry/entries?
>
> Jan
>
>
Basically, the only different is this line that only appears in the "Bad" version.

     (XEN)  MSI     56 vec=28  fixed  edge deassert phys    cpu dest=00000001 mask=0/0/1

"xl debug-key i" also show the following information

     (XEN)    IRQ:  56 affinity:1 vec:28 type=AMD-IOMMU-MSI   status=00000000 mapped, unbound

Not sure what "status=0" means.
   
Before: (Good)
(XEN) MSI information:
(XEN)  MSI     57 vec=c0 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     58 vec=c8 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     59 vec=d0 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     60 vec=d8 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     61 vec=29 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   62 vec=31 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   63 vec=39 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   64 vec=41 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   65 vec=49 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   66 vec=51 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   67 vec=59 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI     68 vec=69 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   69 vec=79 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000003 mask=1/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   70 vec=81 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000003 mask=1/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   71 vec=89 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000003 mask=1/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   72 vec=99 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   73 vec=a1 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000002 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   74 vec=a9 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI     75 vec=b9 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     76 vec=c1 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1


After: (Bad)
(XEN) MSI information:
(XEN)  MSI     56 vec=28  fixed  edge deassert phys    cpu dest=00000001 mask=0/0/1
(XEN)  MSI     57 vec=c0 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     58 vec=c8 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     59 vec=d0 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     60 vec=d8 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     61 vec=29 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   62 vec=31 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   63 vec=39 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   64 vec=41 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   65 vec=49 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   66 vec=51 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   67 vec=59 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI     68 vec=71 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   69 vec=79 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000003 mask=1/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   70 vec=81 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000003 mask=1/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   71 vec=89 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000003 mask=1/1/1
(XEN)  MSI-X   72 vec=99 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   73 vec=a1 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000002 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI-X   74 vec=a9 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=1/0/0
(XEN)  MSI     75 vec=b9 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1
(XEN)  MSI     76 vec=c1 lowest  edge   assert  log lowest dest=00000001 mask=0/1/1

Suravee

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-13 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10  5:05 [PATCH 1/2 V2] iommu/amd: Fix logic for clearing the IOMMU interrupt bits suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-06-10  5:05 ` [PATCH 2/2 V2] iommu/amd: Workaround for erratum 787 suravee.suthikulpanit
2013-06-10  9:35   ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10  9:47     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 10:40       ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 10:53         ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 12:43           ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 13:23             ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 13:41             ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 13:56               ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 13:55             ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 15:03               ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 16:31                 ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 23:13                   ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-11  6:45                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11  6:40                   ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11  8:53                     ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 13:53           ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-10 13:59             ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 15:11               ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-10 15:21                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 10:59   ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-11  6:47     ` [PATCH 2/2 v5] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-17 18:57       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-10 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/2 V2] iommu/amd: Fix logic for clearing the IOMMU interrupt bits Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 10:56 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 11:02   ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 12:18   ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 12:31     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 13:58       ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-10 12:41     ` [PATCH 1/2 v4] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-10 12:46       ` Tim Deegan
2013-06-10 13:49       ` George Dunlap
2013-06-10 14:08         ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-11  6:47       ` [PATCH 1/2 v5] " Jan Beulich
2013-06-11 23:03         ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-12  6:24           ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-12 22:37             ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-06-13  1:44               ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-06-13  7:54                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-13 13:48                   ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2013-06-13 14:20                 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-13 14:30                   ` Processed: " xen
2013-06-13 15:58                 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-13 16:34                   ` Suravee Suthikulanit [this message]
2013-06-14  6:27                     ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-14  6:40                       ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-14  7:14                         ` [PATCH] AMD IOMMU: make interrupt work again Jan Beulich
2013-06-14 16:10                           ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2013-06-17 18:59             ` [PATCH 1/2 v5] iommu/amd: Fix logic for clearing the IOMMU interrupt bits Suravee Suthikulanit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51B9F481.50204@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Jacob.Shin@amd.com \
    --cc=sherry.hurwitz@amd.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).