From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>,
Hanweidong <hanweidong@huawei.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] libxl, hvmloader: Don't relocate memory for MMIO hole
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:16:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C09601.1020105@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371573984-28514-5-git-send-email-george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
On 06/18/2013 05:46 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> At the moment, qemu-xen can't handle memory being relocated by
> hvmloader. This may happen if a device with a large enough memory
> region is passed through to the guest. At the moment, if this
> happens, then at some point in the future qemu will crash and the
> domain will hang. (qemu-traditional is fine.)
>
> It's too late in the release to do a proper fix, so we try to do
> damage control.
>
> hvmloader already has mechanisms to relocate memory to 64-bit space
> if it can't make a big enough MMIO hole. By default this is 2GiB; if
> we just refuse to make the hole bigger if it will overlap with guest
> memory, then the relocation will happen by default.
>
> v2:
> - style fixes
> - fix and expand comment on the MMIO hole loop
> - use "%d" rather than "%s" -> (...)?"1":"0"
> - use bool instead of uint8_t
> - Move 64-bit bar relocate detection to another patch
> - Add more diagnostic messages
>
> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
> CC: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> CC: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
> CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>
> CC: Hanweidong <hanweidong@huawei.com>
> ---
> tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> tools/libxl/libxl_dm.c | 6 +++++
> xen/include/public/hvm/hvm_xs_strings.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c
> index 63d79a2..1ab5124 100644
> --- a/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c
> +++ b/tools/firmware/hvmloader/pci.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@
>
> #include <xen/memory.h>
> #include <xen/hvm/ioreq.h>
> +#include <xen/hvm/hvm_xs_strings.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
>
> unsigned long pci_mem_start = PCI_MEM_START;
> unsigned long pci_mem_end = PCI_MEM_END;
> @@ -58,6 +60,15 @@ void pci_setup(void)
> } *bars = (struct bars *)scratch_start;
> unsigned int i, nr_bars = 0;
>
> + const char *s;
> + bool allow_memory_relocate = 1;
> +
> + s = xenstore_read(HVM_XS_ALLOW_MEMORY_RELOCATE, NULL);
> + if ( s )
> + allow_memory_relocate = (bool)strtoll(s, NULL, 0);
> + printf("Relocating guest memory for lowmem MMIO space %s\n",
> + allow_memory_relocate?"enabled":"disabled");
> +
> /* Program PCI-ISA bridge with appropriate link routes. */
> isa_irq = 0;
> for ( link = 0; link < 4; link++ )
> @@ -209,14 +220,38 @@ void pci_setup(void)
> pci_writew(devfn, PCI_COMMAND, cmd);
> }
>
> - while ( (mmio_total > (pci_mem_end - pci_mem_start)) &&
> - ((pci_mem_start << 1) != 0) )
> + /*
> + * At the moment qemu-xen can't deal with relocated memory regions.
> + * It's too close to the release to make a proper fix; for now,
> + * only allow the MMIO hole to grow large enough to move guest memory
> + * if we're running qemu-traditional. Items that don't fit will be
> + * relocated into the 64-bit address space.
> + *
> + * This loop now does the following:
> + * - If allow_memory_relocate, increase the MMIO hole until it's
> + * big enough, or until it's 2GiB
> + * - If !allow_memory_relocate, increase the MMIO hole until it's
> + * big enough, or until it's 2GiB, or until it overlaps guest
> + * memory
> + */
> + while ( (mmio_total > (pci_mem_end - pci_mem_start))
> + && ((pci_mem_start << 1) != 0)
> + && (allow_memory_relocate
> + || (((pci_mem_start << 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> + < hvm_info->low_mem_pgend)) )
Hmm, the polarity on the comparison here is wrong -- it should be >=, not <.
I've hacked up qemu so that it presents a 256MiB xen platform pci
device. I'll re-send when I've done some more testing.
But I have, I think, reproduced the original problem; the above error
means that for qemu-xen, it will resize the MMIO hole only if it *can*
move guest memory. :-)
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 16:46 [PATCH v2 1/5] hvmloader: Correct bug in low mmio region accounting George Dunlap
2013-06-18 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] hvmloader: Load large devices into high MMIO space as needed George Dunlap
2013-06-19 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20 9:23 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 9:47 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-18 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] hvmloader: Remove minimum size for BARs to relocate to 64-bit space George Dunlap
2013-06-19 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-19 21:14 ` Wei Liu
2013-06-20 9:01 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 9:48 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-18 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] hvmloader: Fix check for needing a 64-bit bar George Dunlap
2013-06-19 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20 10:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-20 10:21 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-18 16:46 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] libxl, hvmloader: Don't relocate memory for MMIO hole George Dunlap
2013-06-18 17:16 ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-06-19 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20 9:22 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 10:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-20 10:20 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 10:29 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20 10:56 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-20 10:59 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 11:01 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 13:35 ` Ian Jackson
2013-06-20 14:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 10:37 ` Ian Jackson
2013-06-20 10:44 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 10:52 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-20 10:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-25 9:56 ` Ian Campbell
2013-06-25 10:15 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-18 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] hvmloader: Correct bug in low mmio region accounting George Dunlap
2013-06-19 17:18 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20 8:56 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 10:40 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20 10:43 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-20 9:36 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C09601.1020105@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=hanweidong@huawei.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).