From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
Hanweidong <hanweidong@huawei.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>,
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] libxl, hvmloader: Don't relocate memory for MMIO hole
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:32:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C40FBB.9030200@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C41A1C02000078000DF837@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
On 21/06/13 08:17, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 20.06.13 at 18:33, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> @@ -57,6 +59,32 @@ void pci_setup(void)
>> } *bars = (struct bars *)scratch_start;
>> unsigned int i, nr_bars = 0;
>>
>> + const char *s;
>> + /*
>> + * Do we allow hvmloader to relocate guest memory in order to
>> + * increase the size of the lowmem MMIO hole? Defaulting to 1
>> + * here will mean that non-libxl toolstacks (including xend and
>> + * home-grown ones) will experience this series as "no change".
>> + * It does mean that those using qemu-xen will still experience
>> + * the bug (described below); but it also means that those using
>> + * qemu-traditional will *not* experience any change; and it also
>> + * means that there is a work-around for those using qemu-xen,
>> + * namely switching to qemu-traditional.
>> + *
>> + * If we defaulted to 0, and failing to resize the hole caused any
>> + * problems with qemu-traditional, then there is no work-around.
>> + *
>> + * Since xend can't talk to qemu-traditional, I think this is the
> qemu-xen?
Oops, good catch. :-)
-George
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 16:33 [PATCH 0/8] Relocate devices rather than memory for qemu-xen George Dunlap
2013-06-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] hvmloader: Remove all 64-bit print arguments George Dunlap
2013-06-20 17:06 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-20 17:09 ` Ian Jackson
2013-06-21 8:37 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-21 8:34 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-21 9:22 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-21 10:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] hvmloader: Remove all 64-bit print arguments [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2013-06-21 10:23 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] hvmloader: Remove all 64-bit print arguments Ian Jackson
2013-06-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] hvmloader: Make the printfs more informative George Dunlap
2013-06-20 17:12 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-21 9:35 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-21 9:50 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-21 10:53 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-21 10:53 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-21 10:35 ` Ian Jackson
2013-06-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] hvmloader: Set up highmem resouce appropriately if there is no RAM above 4G George Dunlap
2013-06-20 17:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-21 7:01 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-21 9:06 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-21 10:38 ` Ian Jackson
2013-06-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] hvmloader: Fix check for needing a 64-bit bar George Dunlap
2013-06-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] hvmloader: Correct bug in low mmio region accounting George Dunlap
2013-06-20 17:20 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-21 7:09 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] hvmloader: Load large devices into high MMIO space as needed George Dunlap
2013-06-20 17:23 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-21 7:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] hvmloader: Remove minimum size for BARs to relocate to 64-bit space George Dunlap
2013-06-20 16:33 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] libxl, hvmloader: Don't relocate memory for MMIO hole George Dunlap
2013-06-20 17:38 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-21 8:31 ` George Dunlap
2013-06-21 11:21 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-06-21 11:31 ` Ian Jackson
2013-06-21 7:17 ` Jan Beulich
2013-06-21 8:32 ` George Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C40FBB.9030200@eu.citrix.com \
--to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=hanweidong@huawei.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.jackson@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).