From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: DuanZhenzhong Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1] x86: fix emuirq regression from XSA-21 fix Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 16:43:04 +0800 Message-ID: <51C95818.2040106@oracle.com> References: <20130514142013.GA10173@konrad-lan.dumpdata.com> <5195944A.3050608@oracle.com> <20130520175706.GA27973@phenom.dumpdata.com> <20130520203855.GA30616@phenom.dumpdata.com> <519B474E.4000202@citrix.com> <20130521134059.GE492@phenom.dumpdata.com> <51AECC3A.7060803@oracle.com> <51C26F98.8070103@oracle.com> <51C7F2FE.3090803@oracle.com> <51C92B8F.6010904@oracle.com> <51C9611802000078000E0336@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <51C94A4A.8050904@oracle.com> <51C9729F02000078000E03BA@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51C9729F02000078000E03BA@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Stefano Stabellini , Andrew Cooper , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Feng Jin , Yuval Shaia , Chien Yen , David Vrabel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 25.06.13 at 09:44, DuanZhenzhong wrote: >>>> >> Any reason of not right? below patch does work as ret is already zero if it >> could get to that line. >> >> zduan >> >> **************************************************** >> x86: fix emuirq regression from XSA-21 fix >> >> The XSA-21 patch broke the assumption of "ret" being zero prior to the >> IRQ_UNBOUND check. >> >> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan >> >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/physdev.c >> @@ -240,7 +240,6 @@ static int physdev_unmap_pirq(struct phy >> if ( ret ) >> return ret; >> >> - ret = -EINVAL; >> if ( unmap->pirq < 0 || unmap->pirq >= d->nr_pirqs ) >> goto free_domain; >> > > So if unmap->pirq is out of range, you'd return 0 (success) > nevertheless - how can that be correct? > > Jan > > You are right. zduan