From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH] nested vmx: Fix the booting of L2 PAE guest Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:41:17 +0100 Message-ID: <51CC40FD.6050305@eu.citrix.com> References: <1372053300-20211-1-git-send-email-dongxiao.xu@intel.com> <40776A41FC278F40B59438AD47D147A9117AF4C1@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <51CC169C02000078000E10FF@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <51CC1A92.3020402@eu.citrix.com> <51CC46A902000078000E1297@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51CC46A902000078000E1297@nat28.tlf.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Dongxiao Xu , Keir Fraser , Eddie Dong , Jun Nakajima , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 27/06/13 13:05, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 27.06.13 at 12:57, George Dunlap wrote: >> On 27/06/13 09:40, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 27.06.13 at 03:14, "Xu, Dongxiao" wrote: >>>> Hi stakeholders, >>>> >>>> I saw the patch is not merged yet. Do you have any other comment about this >>>> patch? I think it is a critical fix for 4.3 release in nested virtualization >>>> side. >>> Irrespective of Keir's ack I was hoping for an ack from one of the >>> VMX maintainers. Even more so as they are, just like you, working >>> for Intel I think it would be appropriate for you to get in touch >>> with them to fulfill their maintainer task here. In fact you should >>> have Cc-ed them with your initial patch submission. >>> >>> Independently of that, you should have also Cc-ed George if you >>> want this to go in for 4.3. In the absence of this, I had simply put >>> this on my post-4.3 queue... >> Well normally I think I would have said "no" to this change. You guys >> haven't done a very good job of engaging with the release process we've >> been trying to develop -- you didn't report this bug to me so that I >> could track it and make informed decisions regarding the release. > So you probably meant this to be sent To: ...@intel.com, and > Cc: ? Yes, sorry -- I meant the "you guys" to be the developers working on nested vmx. You (Jan) have been very engaged with the process, and I appreciate it. :-) -George