From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: Xen 4.3 development update Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:38:51 +0100 Message-ID: <51CDAE0B.1020001@eu.citrix.com> References: <51CC62E602000078000E1380@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <51CDA9BE.7030509@amd.com> <51CDC83A02000078000E1A14@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6036833029040667750==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: jacek burghardt Cc: Suravee Suthikulanit , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============6036833029040667750== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080300090703080905040500" --------------080300090703080905040500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 28/06/13 16:36, jacek burghardt wrote: > > I would to get clarification so is the memory bug fixed then ? So am I > able to assign more 3.6. GB of memory? > You mean for an HVM domain with a PCI device passed through? -George --------------080300090703080905040500 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 28/06/13 16:36, jacek burghardt wrote:

I would to get clarification so is the memory bug fixed then ? So am I able to assign more 3.6. GB of memory?

You mean for an HVM domain with a PCI device passed through?

-George
--------------080300090703080905040500-- --===============6036833029040667750== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel --===============6036833029040667750==--