xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Automatically making a PCI device assignable in the config file
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 14:45:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D6CDE2.90808@eu.citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D6CC76.4040906@citrix.com>

On 05/07/13 14:39, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 05/07/13 12:01, George Dunlap wrote:
>> I've been doing some work to try to make driver domains easier to set
>> up and use.  At the moment, in order to pass a device through to a
>> guest, you first need to assign it to pciback.  This involves doing
>> one of three things:
>> * Running xl pci-assignable-add for the device
>> * Specifying the device to be grabbed on the dom0 Linux command-line
>> * Doing some hackery in /etc/modules.d
>>
>> None of these are very satisfying.  What I think would be better is if
>> there was a way to specify in the guest config file, "If device X is
>> not assignable, try to make it assignable".  That way you can have a
>> driver domain grab the appropriate device just by running "xl create
>> domnet"; and once we have the xendomains script up and running with
>> xl, you can simply configure your domnet appropriately, and then put
>> it in /etc/xen/auto, to be started automatically on boot.
>>
>> My initial idea was to add a parameter to the pci argument in the
>> config file; for example:
>>
>> pci = ['08:04.1,permissive=1,seize=1']
>>
>> The 'seize=1' would indicate that if bdf 08:04.1 is not already
>> assignable, that xl should try to make is assignable.
>>
>> The problem here is that this would need to be parsed by
>> xlu_pci_parse_bdf(), which only takes an argumen tof type
>> libxl_device_pci.
>>
>> Now it seems to me that the right place to do this "seizing" is in xl,
>> not inside libxl -- the functions for doing assignment exist already,
>> and are simple and straightforward.  But doing it in xl, but as a
>> parameter of the "pci" setting, means changing xlu_pci_parse_bdf() to
>> pass something else back, which begins to get awkward.
>>
>> So it seems to me we have a couple of options:
>> 1. Create a new argument, "pci_seize" or something like that, which
>> would be processed separately from pci
>> 2. Change xlu_pci_parse_bdf to take a pointer to an extra struct, for
>> arguments directed at xl rather than libxl
>> 3. Add "seize" to libxl_device_pci, but have it only used by xl
>> 4. Add "seize" to libxl_device_pci, and have libxl do the seizing.
>>
>> Any preference -- or any other ideas?
>>
>>   -George
> How about a setting in xl.conf of "auto-seize pci devices" ?  That way
> the seizing is entirely part of xl

Auto-seizing is fairly dangerous; you could easily accidentally yank out 
the ethernet card, or even the disk that dom0 is using.  I really think 
it should have to be enabled on a device-by-device basis.

I suppose another option would be to be able to set, in xl.conf, a list 
of auto-seizeable devices.  I don't really like that option as well, 
though.  I'd rather be able to keep all the configuration in one place.

  -George

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-05 13:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-05 11:01 RFC: Automatically making a PCI device assignable in the config file George Dunlap
2013-07-05 13:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-07-05 13:45   ` George Dunlap [this message]
2013-07-05 13:48     ` Andrew Cooper
2013-07-05 13:52       ` George Dunlap
2013-07-08 19:23         ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 12:52           ` George Dunlap
2013-07-09 14:25             ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 16:38               ` George Dunlap
2013-07-10 13:45                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-07-10 13:49               ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-07-10 13:55     ` Ian Jackson
2013-07-10 14:45       ` George Dunlap
2013-07-10 15:12         ` Gordan Bobic
2013-07-10 15:29           ` George Dunlap
2013-07-10 15:37             ` Gordan Bobic
2013-07-10 13:53 ` Ian Jackson
2013-07-10 14:48   ` George Dunlap
2013-07-11 11:35     ` David Vrabel
2013-07-12  9:36       ` George Dunlap
2013-07-12  9:55         ` David Vrabel
2013-07-12 10:32           ` George Dunlap
2013-07-12 13:10         ` Ian Jackson
2013-07-12 13:48           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-12 14:43             ` Ian Jackson
2013-07-12 15:01               ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-12 15:09                 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-12 16:02                   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-12 16:08                     ` George Dunlap
2013-07-12 14:44             ` Sander Eikelenboom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D6CDE2.90808@eu.citrix.com \
    --to=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).