From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: George Dunlap <george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Automatically making a PCI device assignable in the config file
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:35:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DE988E.7020700@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51DD7420.5050803@eu.citrix.com>
On 10/07/13 15:48, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/07/13 14:53, Ian Jackson wrote:
>> George Dunlap writes ("RFC: Automatically making a PCI device
>> assignable in the config file"):
>>> I've been doing some work to try to make driver domains easier to set
>>> up and use. At the moment, in order to pass a device through to a
>>> guest, you first need to assign it to pciback. This involves doing
>>> one of three things:
>>> * Running xl pci-assignable-add for the device
>>> * Specifying the device to be grabbed on the dom0 Linux command-line
>>> * Doing some hackery in /etc/modules.d
>>>
>>> None of these are very satisfying. What I think would be better is if
>>> there was a way to specify in the guest config file, "If device X is
>>> not assignable, try to make it assignable". That way you can have a
>>> driver domain grab the appropriate device just by running "xl create
>>> domnet"; and once we have the xendomains script up and running with
>>> xl, you can simply configure your domnet appropriately, and then put
>>> it in /etc/xen/auto, to be started automatically on boot.
>>>
>>> My initial idea was to add a parameter to the pci argument in the
>>> config file; for example:
>>>
>>> pci = ['08:04.1,permissive=1,seize=1']
>>>
>>> The 'seize=1' would indicate that if bdf 08:04.1 is not already
>>> assignable, that xl should try to make is assignable.
>> I think it's a design error that this isn't done automatically by
>> default.
>>
>> It would be nice if there was a safety check that the device isn't
>> currently in use by dom0, but I don't think it's essential. We could
>> just put a note in the docs saying "if you specify your dom0 nic it
>> will go away, duh" or something.
>
> I think it's a really bad interface decision if a simple typo might
> result in you yanking out your disk.
I don't think this proposal really helps with avoiding this. I think
most people will end up always adding 'seize=1' because to avoid having
to do so means altering config files elsewhere and rebooting.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-05 11:01 RFC: Automatically making a PCI device assignable in the config file George Dunlap
2013-07-05 13:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-07-05 13:45 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-05 13:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2013-07-05 13:52 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-08 19:23 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 12:52 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-09 14:25 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-09 16:38 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-10 13:45 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-07-10 13:49 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-07-10 13:55 ` Ian Jackson
2013-07-10 14:45 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-10 15:12 ` Gordan Bobic
2013-07-10 15:29 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-10 15:37 ` Gordan Bobic
2013-07-10 13:53 ` Ian Jackson
2013-07-10 14:48 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-11 11:35 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2013-07-12 9:36 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-12 9:55 ` David Vrabel
2013-07-12 10:32 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-12 13:10 ` Ian Jackson
2013-07-12 13:48 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-12 14:43 ` Ian Jackson
2013-07-12 15:01 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-12 15:09 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-12 16:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-12 16:08 ` George Dunlap
2013-07-12 14:44 ` Sander Eikelenboom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DE988E.7020700@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).