From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Egger, Christoph" Subject: Re: Hypervisor Migration Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:31:47 +0200 Message-ID: <51E69CC3.4020900@amazon.de> References: <51E69850.1070706@amazon.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: emdel Cc: George Dunlap , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 17.07.13 15:23, emdel wrote: > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Egger, Christoph > wrote: > > So let me draw a picture. If it is correct then that means on machine n > hypervisor i must support nested virtualization. > > > Exactly. The hypervisor i must support nested virtualization. > Your picture is exactly what I mean. I am not aware of anyone having tried this so far. If you do we all are interested in your testing results (both positive and negative ones). Christoph